What is it that makes someone like John McCain sound like a
reasonable man one minute, and sound like a senile old fool that just snapped,
the next minute?
What is it that makes someone like Tom Cotton forever look
and smell like a pile of rotting meat carved in the shape of a bipedal homo
erectus?
What is it that makes someone like Marco Rubio go on the
Senate floor days before announcing his candidacy to run for President, and
give a speech that is meaningless, while wrapping it in a fluff of a phony
affection for a Zionist regime in Israel
that makes the Castro regime in Cuba
look like God's heavenly gift to humankind?
The answer to all three questions is that the Jewish method
of taking over and mobilizing America
has been put to work. Its aim is to prepare the superpower for the launch of
Armageddon ... the Jewish fantasy that promises its creators ownership of the
world if and when they will set it on fire and kill their enemies.
It must be understood that fanaticism is alien to the human
psyche because nobody is born with it. This is a disease that is usually
acquired in one of two ways. The first is when someone is subjected to an
extreme condition for an extended period of time during which his humanity is
severely dampened or killed. He will fanatically pursue a vengeful course till
his humanity is stimulated again and he recovers; or the pursuit ends in a
tragedy that takes his life or that of his target.
The second way to acquire the disease of fanaticism is to be
brainwashed and pumped up by a force such as the Jewish propaganda machine
which can turn the individual into a model like those cited above. You can see
how the process takes root by analyzing the editorial of the Wall Street
Journal which came under the title: “President of Pique” and the subtitle:
“Obama assails U.S.
critics but gives the Ayatollah a pass.” It was published on April 13, 2015 in
the Journal.
The editors begin the argument by making an assertion of
their fabrication. They say this: “He [Obama] was especially annoyed at Senator
John McCain for daring to point out that Secretary of State John Kerry's
interpretation of his 'framework' nuclear accord differs with that of Iran
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei.” No, that's not why Obama was annoyed. This
is why: “When you start getting to the point where you are actively
communicating that the United States government and our Secretary of State is
spinning presentations in a negotiation with a foreign power, particularly one
that you say is our enemy, that's a problem. It needs to stop.”
This was not an honest mistake on the part of the editors.
It was a deliberate misrepresentation of the facts, which is why they did not
have the two quotes back to back. Instead, they made a false assertion with
regard to an Obama saying they only quoted later on in the editorial. And what
they did immediately after that is attempt to justify what McCain had said.
This is how they did it: “the Ayatollah is the one who first said that the
Obama Administration was spinning what was in the framework. Mr. McCain then
said he was inclined to believe the Ayatollah more than Mr. Kerry.”
For a change, these back to back quotes were facts. But look
what the editors went on to do. They wrote this: “We also believe the Ayatollah
more than Mr. Kerry, since he's the Iranian who will have to abide by it.” What
was that again? Are the editors of the Wall Street Journal setting a new Jewish
rule which states that when two parties differ on the interpretation of an
agreement, the party abiding by it can interpret it any way he wishes?
Finally, having said that they believe the Ayatollah more
than they do their President or their Secretary of State, the editors quote the
President one last time: “It's not surprising to me that the Supreme Leader and
other people are going to characterize the deal in a way that protects their
political position.”
And based on that, the editors conclude: “Once again Mr.
Obama is more respectful of foreign enemies than domestic opponents.” What? How
is that? This is how, they say, putting words in the President mouth: what the
Ayatollah says doesn't matter, but American critics should shut up because they
want war.