If my neighbor across the street tells me I should worry
about my neighbor on the other side of the driveway because he has bad motives,
I nod and say I'll keep that in mind.
If he tells me I should worry about the fellow that lives
ten blocks away because he might kill me some day, I ask who the neighbor of
that person is so that I go ask about the fellow next door to him. If he says
it's his brother, I tell him to take a hike because I'm not in danger; his brother
is. Or maybe it's the neighbor that should worry about the brother … if not
worry about the safety of his entire family.
This is what America
is coming around to telling the likes of Ido Aharoni. He is Israel 's consul general in New
York , and he wrote an article that came under the title: “The
problem: Iran 's
underlying motives,” published on July 30, 2015 in the New York Daily News. He
tells America it should
worry about far away Iran
and Israel 's neighbor
because that country may someday threaten America with nuclear war.
To explain all this, he does the very Jewish thing of
inventing on the spot what needs to be said to strengthen his argument. Here it
is in abbreviated form of it: “Every security expert will tell you that the
enemy succeeds when he has the desire to attack, and has both the capabilities
and the opportunity to do so.” He goes on to say that the nuclear deal with Iran may have curbed the capabilities and the
opportunity to attack America ,
but have not curbed the desire to do it because this goes to the very nature of
the Iranian regime.
And so Aharoni summarizes: “An agreement that does not
address the root of the problem is incomplete at best, dangerous at worst,” and
then quotes Israel 's
minister of defense who put it this way: “The international community looks at Iran as the solution; we see Iran as the
problem.”
He now makes use of something that was invented by the Jews
a few years ago, and repeated by the mentally deficient in some places. They
said that Israel
is a democracy, and democracies do not fight each other because they are
responsible to their people who do not like wars. They kept repeating this
refrain at a time when the entity that is Israel and the nation that is America
never went through an election cycle during which the most powerful populist
promise was not to boost the military-industrial complex and threaten war, war,
war. It may not have been a threat to attack another so-called democracy, but
it was usually a threat directed at those who could not defend themselves. This
is how democratic courage is defined.
So then what did Aharoni do in this regard? He wrote: “Iran 's regime has been a destabilizing force in
the Middle East and the leading producer of
terrorism in the world. It is not about democracy and freedom; it suppresses
the student-driven movement inside the country … allowing Iran to walk away with a diplomatic achievement
will undermine those fighting for freedom and democracy in Iran .”
And this – believe it or not – is what leads the Israeli consul
general to conclude that “the mullah's goals are Islamic rule and regional
domination.” He calls this meddling in the affairs of others, and then opines
that “it is utterly undisturbed by the nuclear deal.” This means, that the
Western negotiators should have dictated to the Iranians how to run their
internal affairs in order to have the sanctions lifted.
The problem with this guy – and all guys like him – is that
he ignores the fact that what he does is but a small part of the tsunami of
incitements that the Jews and their mouthpieces are directing at the Americans
to move against Iran .
And so he grotesquely comes up with the accusation that “they [the Iranians]
have no intention to stop the incitement against America and the other free and open
societies.” Go figure.
He gives as example the chants “death to America , death to Israel ”
that the people break into when the Jews and their mentally retarded followers
in America
utter “all options are on the table.”