When human babies are born, and they grow up in a given set
of circumstances without being exposed to anything different, they accept what
they see as the norm they shall live with till they die. Meanwhile, day in and
day out, they learn to appreciate what's around them as they become ever more
attached to it. And as they mature with the passage of time, they harmonize
their daily lives around what they see and what they possess.
As long as those conditions remain undisturbed, the society
in which these people live remains stable. But it does not take much to rile it
by those who know how to stir the pot. They know that the human child is wired
to learn and to rebel against authority. And so, they tell the young of that
society they can have something better if only their elders stepped out of the
way. They suggest that the young nudge their elders and urge them to change.
But when this does not happen fast enough, the impatient youngsters – who are
eager to open new horizons for themselves – turn against the elders, and thus
begin to destabilize the existing order.
Depending on how much a society is set in its ways, and how
much push is exerted by one side or by the two sides in the struggle, change
will come with little violence or will come with a great deal of it. But if the
two sides are matched, and if they are prone to extreme violence, they will end
up destroying their society. For all practical purposes, they will have
rendered it dysfunctional, a condition that will define it as a failed state.
Now the question is this: Why would someone want to
interfere with the lives of a stable society by approaching its restless young,
urging them to rebel against the existing order? The answer is that there are many
reasons why this can happen, but since this discussion is not about these
people, I shall leave that discussion for another time. What's important to
know for now is that such people can be so fanatic about changing someone else;
they will go as far as work toward the annihilation of that someone.
This is what a post-Holocaust Jewish group of Americans are
trying to do to the nations they regard as refusing to comply with their vision
of a world that's safe for the Jews to live in. They took command of the
relevant American institutions, and they started to go after the states in the
Middle East and beyond which they saw as standing in the way of Israel
fulfilling the Jewish dream of a mighty empire that the nations of the region,
if not the world, will fear, respect and bow to them the way that the American
Congress bows so low as to kiss the ground on which they tread.
Having scored enormous success using American power to
destabilize a number of nations in the Middle East and Africa, the Jews began to
realize that failed states pose a greater danger to Israel
than stable ones which may not necessarily be friendly to them or to Israel . So you
think, they must have reversed policy and sat quietly. But you would be wrong
because what they did was double-down on the effort to get America to do more of the same old thing for
them and for Israel .
There is a great deal more that you can read about failed
states and their threat to the world when you look at: “The rise of the failed
states,” an article that also came under the subtitle: “Crumbling nations
intensify the danger of global turmoil.” It was written by Richard W. Rahn, and
published on July 6, 2015 in the Washington Times.
You should know, however that Rahn who is of the Cato
Institute and chair of the Institute for Global Economic Growth has a point of
view through which he sees and interprets the world. And so, you should expect
that he would spin his arguments to comply with that point of view. And there
is nothing wrong with that.
As to what some nations are doing to protect their
population from the Jewish American onslaught on the minds of the young, you
can read all about the bellyaching that the Jewish editors of the Wall Street
Journal are doing. They wrote a piece under the title: “The Closing of the
Russian Mind,” an editorial that also came under the subtitle: “The Kremlin
targets U.S.
and domestic civil-society groups.” It was published on July 10, 2015 in the
Journal.