The editors of the New York Daily News have devised a new
way to make their point. In the piece they wrote under the title: “Mauled by
the mullahs” and the subtitle: “Obama is rushing headlong into a disastrous
nuclear deal with Iran ,”
they put words into the mouth of the Iranians, and then quoted them directly.
That approach has had the effect of showing how different
the two versions are. Therefore, it can only serve to demonstrate that the
editors of the rag – who used to mutilate history – are now in the business of
mauling logic itself. The notorious editorial was published on July 3, 2015 in
the New York Daily News.
Speaking in the name of the mullahs, here is what President
Hassan Rouhani said will happen if the talks fail ... as reported by the
editors of the rag themselves: “the government [of Iran] will be ready to
immediately reverse the path in a more severe way than they can ever dream of.”
In case you wondered, this does not sound as severe as: “all options are on the
table” because the Iranians are more gentlemanly than their counterparts, the
Jewish pundits of America .
But the following are the words which the editors put into
Rouhani's mouth: “We have no nuclear weapons program. You must immediately give
us a nuclear program, and immediately remove the punishing economic sanctions
meant to deter us from developing one. If you don't do that, we'll use our
program, which we do not have, to build a nuclear weapon within months.” Look
at the difference between the two versions, and you'll realize how far off the
mark the screwy logic of Jewish punditry can take these people. It is scary.
And what do the editors call that? They call it: “radical
Islamist craziness.” They go on to say that the Iranian position is absurd, and
they lament that “the Obama administration is frantically pressing ahead to
close the deal.” They use the word 'frantically' despite the fact that they say
Iran
has pursued its nuclear program for more than a decade and that the current
talks have gone into overtime … all of which suggests that the negotiators are
relaxed and not frantic. Well, maybe the editors are, and they imagine seeing
the negotiators when looking in the mirror. Maybe they need a psychiatrist.
Still, with that same distorted vision, they call Iran “a very evil state – one publicly committed
to the destruction of Israel
and America .”
The editors say this much despite the fact that the Americans, and not the
Iranians, were the ones to have said that all options were on the table … which
is understood to mean that if the talks fail, America
will bomb Iran
to kingdom come.
Well, this would not be the first time that America or
Israel attempted to inflict this much horror on innocent people, but they are
not considered evil for actually doing it … as much as Iran is evil for having
the potential to do it without actually doing it. That's Jewish logic.
Moreover – Israel
which has hundreds of mouthpieces dispersed around the world – especially in
the English speaking world, has had its megaphones amplify the warning that Israel has a nuclear arsenal and submarines to
deliver them onto the cities of Iran .
This bravado may be the phantom erection of the Jewish eunuch, but it is
indicative of a belligerent character that weeps with envy at the gentle and
dignified power of his opponent.
At this point, the editorial displays the mark of its
Jewishness by doing something that's very Jewish. The editors bite the hand
which they beg to start strangling the opponent they cannot scare.
Look at this series of passages: “Secretary of State John
Kerry said that he wasn't concerned … That too is crazy.” They continue with
this: “the Obama administration seems to be negotiating on its behalf, such is
the desperation...” And with this: “President Obama was forced to admit...” But
they don't say who forced him to admit – this being the Jewish habit of
automatically flashing their castration, not realizing they have nothing to
show for their effort.