Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Here is why the Jews never have a Plan B

When you're about to take action on something, you design a master plan for it and you think of the possible consequences that may flow from your actions. Thus, you work into the plan contingency moves you may have to implement should something go contrary to the master plan. Such package, together with an existing strategy, makes up what is called plan B.

Things are done this way under normal conditions everywhere in the world because when people design a plan, they think of what they will put into it or add to it. However, there are times when an exception comes into play, a condition that happens when people wish to remove something they consider to be a nuisance, rather than add something. In this case, they plan the removal of the thing regardless of what the consequences may turn out to be. And so, they design neither a plan B nor an exit strategy for the master plan.

When in the business of daily living, the Jews find themselves interacting with each other or with non-Jews, they follow these norms almost as well as anyone. Where they differ from the rest of humanity is when they see a consequential situation that shows the potential to be exploited. This is when they immediately think of an extraordinary plan that will make the situation work for the benefit of Israel and the collective known as World Jewry … come hell or high water.

Because such plan would fall outside the norm, it compels the Jews to treat the situation not in the way they treat something they seek to add, but in the way they treat something they wish to remove. Thus, they will disregard the need to fashion an exit strategy or prepare a plan B. If asked, they justify taking such course of action on the basis that they have the religious duty to do what is good for the Jewish collective and for Israel. They further explain that if something goes wrong, it will be that God has willed it. And when the time comes, He will be there to rescue the collective, and make things right again, they say.

That backgrounder should go a long way to explain the article that came under the title: “An alternative to Obama's deal: A better deal” and the subtitle: “It's not too late for Americans to tell the president no.” It was written by Lee Zeldin who is co-chairman of the House Republican Israel Caucus, and was published on July 19, 2015 in the Washington Times.

Lee Zeldin says at the outset that a better deal could have been negotiated between the (P5+1) group and Iran. But when you go over the article, you find that there is very little of what he wants to add to the deal just negotiated between the parties, and a great deal of what he wishes to take out of it. This indicates a fundamental difference between the vision of the world – represented by the (P5+1) group – and the vision of the Jews – represented by Zeldin, the quintessential Jew.

So the question: What could lie at the basis of those differences? And you find the answer to the question in the following passage: “Many supporters of the deal believe there is nothing to worry about … but we should approach these claims with deep skepticism. Iran cannot be trusted.” The mentality that engenders such lack of trust in others being the way that the Jews handle matters of importance, their vision of the world and their interaction with it define the word prejudice.

That word means to judge someone or something in advance. What the Jews have done here is pre-judge all of humanity as being untrustworthy. In fact, they clearly demonstrate they distrust Iran for being deceitful. And they distrust the representatives of the world, including the United States of America, for allowing themselves to be duped by the negotiating team from Iran.

This being the way that the Jews operate, they find themselves in a permanent state of handicap when it comes to doing things for themselves. This condition obliges them to live a parasitic existence at the expense of others. And the way they achieve this state of existence is by gravitating toward the biggest kid on the bloc. They flatter him and get him to do things for them.

But since the Jews do not know how to build something, they get the big kid to destroy what belongs to others. This is what they taught America to do in the Middle East and beyond. And this is why the world is developing a sense of contempt for an America it used to love and respect. What a shame!