Western Europe, North America, Sub-Saharan Africa, Australia , a good part of Asia, and the Middle
East (including Egypt ) are
on the alert, and have been since the rise to power and to prominence of the
Islamic State in Iraq
and Syria (ISIS).
And so now, you have this guy who goes by the name, David
Hearst, writing an article for a rag that is called Huffington Post, saying
that the Islamic State was stoked in all of those places by their leaders, and
not just in Iraq or Syria . Or does
Hearst really say that?
Well, read the article that came under the title: “Sisi is
Pushing Egypt to the Brink” and judge for yourself. Published on June 30, 2015
in the Huffington Post, the article starts like this: “Railing against the
inability of the state to deal with the militant insurgency he himself stoked,
Sisi pledged...” Since Egypt
finds itself in the company of nations making up more than half the Globe, what
applies to Egypt 's
goose must also apply to the Globe's gander. And what Sisi has stoked, the
leaders around the world must have also stoked. But our esteemed author
disagrees as you will soon see.
Apparently, Hearst who lives in Britain , is not happy that the
Egyptians are “going to amend the law to allow [them] to implement justice as
soon as possible.” If this is true, and he is unhappy about prompt justice, he
better not come live in North America because
we have a saying around here that goes like this: “Justice delayed is justice
denied.” This is why we always talk about prompt justice, even when we fail to
deliver it on time … something that happens most of the time in our so-called
liberal democracy.
David Hearst's problem could be that he is mixing two events
which, in reality have nothing to do with each other. The first event is the
Egyptian Revolution which started four years ago and lasted about two years.
The second event is an ongoing and still escalating Muslim response to the
Jewish American launch of a Judeo-Christian war against Islam.
As to the Egyptian Revolution, this was a social experiment
that's no different from what happened in many places around the globe at other
times. When we say experiment, we mean that the people of Egypt gave
themselves the right to choose a government. They gave that government enough
time to show its colors, and when the colors turned out to be the wrong ones,
the people told it to step aside. When it refused, the people called on their
army to remove it from office, and that was done. Now, who on Earth has the
right to tell the people of Egypt
they should have done things differently? Believe it or not, there are some
wackos who believe they have that right.
As to the Muslim response to the Judeo-Christian war that America 's Jews have launched against Islam, it
all began with the realization that Sharia financing was becoming popular
around the world, including America .
To plant fear in the hearts of people and to further exploit the situation, the
forever opportunistic Jews pointed to that trend and argued that if today is
the day that Sharia financing is tolerated; tomorrow will be the day when the
full panoply of Sharia Law will be imposed on Western societies, and the veil
imposed on Western women.
That was the layer of demagoguery upon which other layers
were piled. Before long, the unsavory acts committed by a handful of Muslim
kids were described as being the things that Sharia Law will impose on the West
– and they include the deep-seated hatred for freedom which lurks in the heart
of every Muslim. From there, things escalated to the point that a religious war
was triggered and is now being fought. All this is happening while a growing
number of souls in America
are advocating the start of a full-blown war between the Islamic State and
Judeo-Christian America.
And so, when in the mind of David Hearst the story of the
Egyptian Revolution got mixed with the story of the Muslim response to the war
that was brought to them, David Hearst began to argue that aside from what
happens everywhere else in the world, the ISIS activities in Egypt were the
direct result of Sisi's style of governance.
With this kind of screwy logic, our author denies the
existence of a link between the terrorists’ activities of ISIS around the world
and its terrorist activities in Egypt .
Why does he do that? Because he wants to blame it all on Sisi, and go from
there to end his presentation with this: “If Sisi is left in charge, a surprise
awaits the West in Egypt .
It will be of a magnitude far greater than the fall of Mosul to the Islamic State.”
This means he wants to undo what the people of Egypt have done
for themselves, which is that they put Sisi in charge of their government. This
being contrary to the tenets of “liberal democracy” as he understands the concept,
his fervent desire is to see the regime in Egypt changed, and replaced with
something that looks like Libya or Iraq, maybe even South Sudan – those shiny
examples of Western liberal democracy.