There was a time long ago when the ethnic communities in North America began to sense that the Jews were slowly
but surely strangling the freedom of expression that the newcomers had expected
to see, to practice and to enjoy by virtue of being citizens of this continent.
Some people even studied the phenomenon and found a way to explain it to those
who couldn't figure out why such things were happening here.
They explained it this way: imagine a beautiful house that
everyone in the neighborhood loves. If a Jew has a fall out with its owner and
wants to hurt him, he goes to city hall and convinces the zoning officers that
what counts is not the overall look of the house but the fact that it has one
brick – one single brick – whose color is slightly different from the others.
For this reason the house must be condemned and demolished, says the Jew, and
the zoning officers say yes sir, amen sir.
Now imagine a dilapidated house that inspector after
inspector has labeled a hazard to the neighborhood, and called for its
demolition and yet, city hall does not move to have it taken down. You check
the reason why, and discover that it is owned by a Jew who has convinced the
zoning officers that what counts is not the danger that the house represents
but the fact that it has one brick – one single brick – whose color is slightly
different from the others; therefore the house must be spared. And the zoning
officers say yes sir, amen sir.
Decades have passed since those days, and we find that the
Jews have now taken full control of the North American continent using that
trick and a bagful of other similar tricks. We also find that some of the
predictions made by some of the people at the time have materialized. They said
then that the Jews were careful enough to attack only the newcomers who could
not defend themselves. But sooner or later, they went on to say, the Jews will
feel confident enough to attack everyone else up to and including the American
President for doing his job – that of serving the interests of the United
States.
This is what's happening now, and if you look at the tricks
that the Jews are using, you'll find them to be an updated version of those
they used long ago. Two articles illustrate how that works. The first is a
column that came under the title: “The Syria Sham and the Iran Deal” and the
subtitle: “Syria
cheated on its chemical commitments. Iran will cheat on its nuclear
ones. Obama provides cover for both.” It was written by Bret Stephens and
published on July 28, 2015 in the Wall Street Journal. The second came under
the title: “Iran :
The Real Deal,” written by Howard J. Klein and published on July 29, 2015 in
the Weekly Standard.
In his column, Stephens brushes aside what “has been
confirmed by the organization internationally charged with eliminating chemical
weapons,” mainly that such weapons have been removed from Syria … at
least to the tune of 92.5 % if not better. He then quotes a short passage from
an article that was written in the Journal alleging that US intelligence
concluded that Syria didn't give up all the chemical weapons “it was supposed
to” when, in fact, Syria did.
To see what game the Journal people are playing, it must be
understood that every element in the universe is a chemical element or a
compound thereof ... from the food preserving substances we consume to the
detergents we do not. The same goes for everything that's used in the machinery
of war, such as gun powder and the fuels that power the vehicles. A number of
chemical compounds constitute banned weapons of mass destruction, among them
phosphoric bombs and napalm bombs. Syria never used them nor does it
possess them at present. In fact, the only military that used them, and
continues to stockpile them are the Israelis. They were condemned for using
these weapons in the past, and they refuse to relinquish them now.
As to Howard Klein, he frames his argument in such a way as
to sound like he is accusing President Obama of betraying a promise he made to
the “public” if not betraying his oath of office. He then speculates that
“there can only be two reasons for this failure.” He discards one reason, and
maintains the notion that “the negotiations regarding Iran 's nukes
were a smokescreen for the pursuit of a different agenda.”