Saturday, August 1, 2015

They wonder why the Iranians reciprocate

There is only one way to describe the individuals in America who complain that the people of Iran gather at times and chant in unison: “Death to America, death to Israel.” Call these individuals deaf-and-dumb. And while you're at it, add moron to that designation.

If you want to know why you need to do that, read the article which came under the title: “Reviving 'peace through strength,'” and the subtitle: “It's the only effective alternative to Obama's bad deal.” Written by Peter Hannaford and Robert Zapesochny, the article was published on July 28, 2015 in the Washington Times.

This is by no means the only time that views such as those expressed in the article were published. In fact, they were time and time again when the fashion in America was to march exposed, arm-in-arm with Netanyahu, in order to show the Iranians how endowed the eunuchs can become if only America would give them bunker buster bombs, and lease to them the B-52 bombers that would carry those bombs to where they will be dropped on Iran's symbols of progress. The morons see this as causing destruction and mayhem where the Iranians spent much time and energy to catch up with modernity … and their hearts flutter with delightful expectation.

Then as now, the people who advocate that course of action make it clear what they desire … then as now, the people who complain about the Iranian responses demonstrate a high degree of mental retardation, failing to see the connection between the call for America and Israel to destroy Iran, and Iran's reciprocation expressed as: Death to America, death to Israel.

Hannaford and Zapesochny demonstrate total and absolute ignorance of the fact that even after the Iranian revolution, and till the advent of Ahmadinejad, the Israelis in the Middle East and their supporters in America worked diligently with the Iranian Shiites to oppose and undermine the Sunnis because they represented – in the Jewish lexicon – the problematic “Arab core.” Thus, our two authors write: “Since 1979, the driving force of the country's rulers has been to destroy Israel” among other goals. And the authors go on to say that the effort of the Iranians “to create a nuclear arsenal has been part of their strategy to accomplish these goals.”

They describe and attack the weaknesses they see in the nuclear deal negotiated between Iran and the (P5+1) nations, which include the United States. And they offer that “the alternative is renewed peace through strength.” The problem with this approach, however, is that they do not see (anymore than do the Iranians) President Obama use air power to destroy Iran's installations. For this reason, they report that two members of Congress: Democrat Grace Meng and Republican Randy Weber, have suggested that bunker buster bombs be given to Israel to do the job.

And since Israel does not have the warplanes that can carry these bombs to Iran, the writers advocate that America lease to the Israelis some of its B-52s. The writers do something else – perhaps consciously; perhaps subconsciously – and that is to temporarily elevate Netanyahu from the position of Prime Minister of Israel to President of the United States of America. Here is how they do that: “The Iranians don't think [much of] Mr. Obama using military force, but will think twice about President Netanyahu.”

Hannaford and Zapesochny then remind the world, especially the Iranians, that this is not just the daydream of a couple of congresspeople who may be high on the fumes of an illicit substance, but the considered content of a whole bunch of Jewish-American style septic tanks masquerading as think tanks – such as the Council on Foreign Relations – whose Matthew Kroenig wrote in prestigious Foreign Affairs, a detailed account of the targets that must be hit in Iran. And they list those targets.

They explain that this must be done because “restoring sanctions will be difficult. Russia, China, and many Europeans want to trade with Iran.” They go on to say that time is of the essence because “once the sanctions are lifted, Russia may sell its S-300 anti-aircraft system to Iran which could nullify the threat of the non-stealth B-52s and their bunker buster bombs.”

In other words, our two clowns are saying that Iran must be bombed now whether or not some thinking – any kind of thinking – will be done later. And you can be certain they will whine when the Iranians respond: Death to America, death to Israel.