Imagine that every time a calamity happens in America – such
as a train derailment or a horrendous highway accident – some crazy individuals
in the world celebrate the occurrence by talking about it, not in sorrow or
sympathy for those who suffer, but by chewing over the real and imagined
deficiencies of the American system of governance.
Now imagine another type of crazy individuals celebrating
with joy and glee every time that a successful terrorist attack takes place in
America by discussing such things as Guantanamo, the NSA spying on people, the
waterboarding, the rendition scandal, and all that tells them America is a
democracy in name only because it is as fake in their eyes as a three-dollar
bill.
Still, imagine a third type of crazy people holding vigils
to mourn every success that America
scores in science, industry and the economy. What would you say of all these
happenings? Would you not say that the world is full of crazy people? How about
someone proving to you that all those crazies are not spread around the world
but are concentrated in one and the same country? You would think – at least
for a moment – that the country is full of animals, monstrous animals and not
of human beings, would you not?
Well, let me tell you something, my friend, this is exactly
what is happening in America … not everywhere in the land but mostly in the
editorial rooms of the media, and in the studios of the audio-visuals –
especially where there is a large concentration of Jews. So then, what do these
people mourn, and what do they celebrate? They mourn the success of the Arab
and Muslim countries, and they celebrate the calamities that befall them.
When you follow what they transmit to their audiences in
spoken language, body language, the choice of words they make, the images they
broadcast, and the styles they adopt, you get the feeling that these people
wish to see the complete disintegration of the Arab and Muslim worlds,
especially at this time, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Iran. And they will do
anything and everything they can to convince the Congress of subhumans still
running the country they call America
– to work to those ends.
You get a sense of all this when you read the editorial in
the New York Times which came under the title: “The questionable Legality of
military Aid to Egypt ,”
published on August 19, 2015. The excuse for writing it is that a senator who
goes by the name Patrick Leahy relied on a report issued by the State
Department discussing the operation that the Egyptian government has conducted
against terrorists in the Sinai, resulting in a successful campaign that
eventually brought peace and development for the civilian population of the Peninsula .
All along – let me repeat, it was all along the time that
the terrorists were scoring murderous successes against the civilians and the
police protecting them, that the media types in America
were dancing in the studios and the editorial boards with gleeful reporting
about the number of dead Egyptians that the ISIS
killers were scoring.
They tallied the numbers from past operations and displayed
them like a father displays his son's athletic medals. And why all that pride?
Because the numbers should – get this now because it's the most important part
of the story – the numbers should humiliate the Egyptian military. That's what
those subhumans were celebrating.
But why now? Why has the New York Times come up with this
editorial at this time? Because negotiations are about to start between Egypt and not just America , but the three NAFTA
countries, aiming to forge a free trade agreement between them.
The editors of the Times know that Egypt will be better off without having a
military partnership with America .
But as promiscuous as the country has been in forging trade agreements with
other countries, it still wants to expand the list of countries with which it
can trade freely.
Be that as it may, it is the choice of the Egyptian people,
and that's the choice that is stirring the bile of those who would rather dance
at Egypt 's
calamities than celebrate its successes in commerce and industry.