To make a sophisticated machine work, you bring many parts
together, each of which functions according to a scientific principle. For
example, the battery of a car performs according to chemical principles whereas
the shock absorbers perform according to mechanical principles. Of course, you
find batteries in all sorts of machines and they all work, more or less,
according to the same chemical principles. The same goes for the shock
absorbers which you also find in scooters and bikes.
But when it comes to the overall principle that
differentiates one machine from another, you'll find that each machine performs
according to a unique principle that would be transferable to another machine
only by making major modifications. For example, the car is known for its
internal combustion engine, though other machines function by that same
principle. Likewise, the jet plane is known for its jet engine, though some
experimenters use a similar engine to power a race car, for example.
By analogy, those concepts apply to the most sophisticated
machines of all; the ones we call cultures. These are evolutionary constructs
made of parts that are transferable from one culture to another with little
modification or none at all. But each culture has one or two features which are
so unique to it, they define the entire culture. Because they do this, you can
begin to understand why things happen inside one culture and not the others;
why things happen to one culture and not another.
The Jewish culture does not escape that sort of analysis. If
there is one feature about it that differentiates it from all the others, it is
that, sooner or later, it brings out the worst of the cultures with which it
mingles, and they tend to respond with violence. This happened to the Jews
wherever they went in whatever era you care to study. So you ask: What is it
about the Jewish culture that makes its adherents behave in the way that so
revolts the host – no matter who it is or when it is – the people tend to move
against the Jews ... most likely in a violent manner?
Well, an editorial in the Jewish inspired Wall Street
Journal helps us understand what happens inside the Jewish culture, allowing us
to identify the principle that is so unique to it, people everywhere – at all
times – turned against it ... with violence or without. The editorial came
under the title: “Schumer's Iran Dissent” and the subtitle: “The New Yorker
joins a growing list of Democratic opponents.” It was published on August 7, 2015
in the Journal.
The background against which the current scene unfolds is
this: Shortly after the Jews terrorized the Brits and pushed them out of Palestine , they worked on infiltrating America which
had risen to become the most powerful nation on Earth. Using a combination of
rewards and blackmail, they succeeded in occupying all the strategic positions
that gave them the levers by which to run the country for the benefit of Israel and for
World Jewry. And so they ruled by the dictatorship of the cabal.
One of those positions is occupied by Chuck Schumer who
finds himself having a hard time getting things done his way because America has
reached the point where it can no longer accede to the demands of the Jews.
Schumer wants to set America
on a warpath that will see it bomb Iran
– which he considers a potential rival to Israel – but finds himself pitted
against a President whose interest is the welfare of the American people.
Schumer has the American Congress of traitors on his side, but the stakes are so
high, even this assembly of the mentally retarded has balked at saying the
usual, yes master Jew … at least until now.
Feeling the pressure of a cabal that wants him to push
against the President at considerable risk to the future of his career, Schumer
came out against the deal negotiated with Iran , but made it known that he
will not push others to follow in his footsteps. And this is where you see the
editors of the Journal, who form the mouthpiece of the cabal, use his decision
to give advice to others.
It is that advice which uniquely defines the Jewish culture
as being what it is. It is the cultural feature that everyone and every-when on
this planet saw it as deserving a pogrom or a holocaust to neutralize.
It begins with the editors lamenting: “Mr. Obama may escape
humiliation only because … he maneuvered to need only one-third of either house
to uphold his veto.” They go on to describe what this amounts to: “In other
words, he can still proceed to implement the accord, but only by ignoring the consensus
view of the American public.”
Thus, the Jewish cabal, standing as a Fifth Column that
works for Israel
and for World Jewry, has tried but failed to humiliate its own President. And
how did the adherents try that? They called the handful of mentally retarded
traitors in the Congress “the consensus view of the American public.”
This means that in the eyes of the Jews, two or three
hundred blackmailed traitors, bought with a song and a false promise constitute
the “America
public.” As to the other 320 million souls who populate the nation … well, they
are the drones who work to generate the money that the Jews collect, and die in
the wars that the Jews instigate.