For many decades if not centuries, the human race has
accepted a theory – based on the observed facts – that the Jews are the group
most responsible for the wars that have plagued mankind since the beginning of
time. This was the view in the Anglophile world as well till the Jews fashioned
the concept of 'political correctness' and pumped it into the culture.
For a time after that, people who mentioned that reality
were treated like the anti-Semites who were bent on defaming the Jews, and who
sought to spark a holocaust that will exterminate them once and for all. This
situation lasted till the time when the Jews took control of the Anglophile
media, made it propagate the Jewish message and nothing else. And so, it came
to pass that the Jews who used to destroy the people that knew they were the
ones who started the wars – were now the people who bragged about their
exploits at making America
go to war in furtherance of the Jewish/Israeli agenda.
And they announced triumphantly to the world that they will
get America to attack Iran because –
like their leader, Benjamin Netanyahu put it – they “know how to do these
things.” But the idea provoked the American people so much that they let out a
roar letting their leaders known they were tired of the wars that sapped their
country's finances dry, killed thousands of its young people and incapacitated
tens of thousands more. And the roar was heard in Washington , upon which President Obama said
he will work for peace instead. And so he did.
When this happened, and the Jews saw that they will not be
able to get America involved in another Middle Eastern war, they started doing
the very Jewish thing of telling the world they were the ones who stood for
peace all along while Barack Obama stood for war. Not only that, but they went
on to say that he chose to pursue a policy that will lead to war.
And this is the idea that Joshua Muravchik is propounding in
the article that came under the title: “Obama's Nuclear Deal is the Most Likely
Path to War,” published on August 19, 2015 in the Weekly Standard. It is a
marvelous example of a piece of writing that stands on legs of 'coulds' and
'mights' where a collection of 'this could happen' and 'that might result' lead
the author to construct a most unlikely scenario, presenting it as a real
possibility – as real as the sick fantasy that’s in his head.
He starts with a question that contains the things which
horrify the American people, most notably having boots on the ground in a foreign
land, engaged in a murderous war. Thus, Muravchik puts the question in this
form: “How might the United States
end up in a boots-on-the-ground shooting war with Iran ?” He goes on to expand on a
theory that is made of 4 'mights' and 6 'coulds' to ultimately argue in favor
of the on-its-head-view that considers war to be peace, and peace to be war.
Here are the four mights: (1) “Iran ,
which claims Bahrain as its
own territory, might take action;” (2) “Tehran
might stir up Kuwait 's
sometimes restive Shiite minority;” (3) “Israel might be confronted with its
largest war since 1967;” and (4) “mounting Middle Eastern violence might
embolden Vladimir Putin to new steps toward his goal.”
And here are the six coulds: (1) “What scenarios could lead
to that?” (2) “There are numerous imaginable flashpoints at which this could
intensify;” (3) “Iran's Yemeni allies, tutored by Hezbollah, could strike on
Saudi territory;” (4) “Bahrain's restive Shiite majority could rise;” (5)
“money and volunteers could bring these fanatics new conquests;” and (6) “Any
of these scenarios could draw the United States into just the kind of briar
patch that President Obama says he wants to avoid.”
Having constructed the fantasy of a diseased mind based on
ten mights and coulds, Joshua Muravchik goes on to tell that: “He [Obama] mocks
his critics as warmongers, but it is his ill-conceived policy that is most
likely to get us into a war.”
And there is a lesson to learn in all of this, my friend. It
is that when reading something written by a Jew, the moment you encounter a
might or a could, you get away from the thing because all that the writer is
trying to do is ejaculate into your head, your heart and your soul a diseased
shot of his Jewish moral syphilis.