Monday, August 3, 2015

Still warmongering, still protecting Israel

John Bolton is so enamored with the status quo, he wrote (for the second time that I know of) disapprovingly about something that has the potential to change it. He makes his point in the article that came under the title: “The Iran Deal's Dangerous Precedent," published in the New York Times on August 3, 2015.

However, he does not make the point till he gets near to the end of the article because he loves something else more urgently than he does the status quo. That would be to run the world not by the force of reason but the force of the whip. It is a gigantic whip that is made of warplanes, warships and war-everything else he would crack to threaten and discipline those who violate America's dictates … Jewish America, that is.

And so, he begins the article by lamenting: “Had anyone believed the mantra that 'all options are on the table,' the Vienna agreement might have emerged less advantageously for Tehran;” all options being euphemism for 'listen to the crack of my whip.' But because he believes that a credibility gap has developed, he sees the threat as being moot if not meaningless at this time.

This brings him to the verification regime that will ascertain whether or not Iran is cheating on the nuclear deal, and what to do if that nation is caught transgressing. He says that Mr. Obama's plan is not to use the whip, “but to apply snapback sanctions.” This will not work, says Bolton, because unless Tehran knows it will suffer greatly if it cheats, it will cheat ... and most likely get away with it. This will happen, in his opinion, because the Vienna deal offers Iran a way out.

He explains that if America snaps back the sanctions, Iran will have the right to declare the deal abrogated and resume its nuclear program, having pocketed the economic benefits that came with the signing of the deal. Not only that, but Iran will do so knowing that no one else will join America in snapping the sanctions because they will all want to continue doing business with Iran.

But even if Iran decides not to call the agreement abrogated – invoking the provisions that deal with the dispute resolution mechanism instead – it will have so many ways to obfuscate, it can prolong the dispute indefinitely, says Bolton. And this is where the weakness of his logic comes to the fore. The question is this: Why would Iran want to obfuscate? To cheat some more? Pile up cheating on top of cheating? Well, that would be the best way to demonstrate it is trying to build the bomb ... a move that everyone agrees is a no no. And everyone will join in the effort to stop it from achieving that goal. Iran will have hung itself with a rope of its own making.

With the monumental dissolution of his logic regarding that issue, John Bolton shifts his attention to tackling the status quo issue. He mentions the provision that prevents Russia or China from casting a veto in case America brings a snapback resolution to the Security Council. What they will have to do, instead, is convince the Council it is better not to reinstate the sanctions. If they fail to do so within 30 days, America will get things done its way. Otherwise, the lifting of the sanctions will remain in force.

What bothers John Bolton in all this, is that a precedent has been set for a process of veto-nullification that may someday come around and haunt America. He explains that the use of the veto is what protected America for 70 years. But come to think of it, this is no explanation given that he failed to give a single example as to when America was in danger, and when it used the veto to protect itself.

But wait a minute, wait a minute. America has used the veto like a drunken sailor uses whiskey to quench his thirst. How and why did America do that? It did it to protect Israel from the wrath of a world that has had it up to here with that entity's savage behavior and its criminal conduct in continuing its occupation of Palestine, its repeated war crimes against Palestine and Lebanon, and its use of prohibited weapons.

Again, Bolton has conflated America and Israel to heap on the little fart that is Israel, the deference that the world would have normally heaped on superpower America.

Well, Bolton may or may not have realized it, but the sad result is that America has been dragged down to Israel's level rather than Israel being raised to America's level.

That's where America needs to be protected.