Senator Chuck Schumer who announced his intention to vote
against the Iran
nuclear deal said that distrust of the Iranians motivated him to take that
position. So be it. But Schumer's reason for rejecting the deal is also why a
number of other people – mostly Jews – have argued against the deal. Among
these were the avowed warmongers who openly advocated the bombing of Iran because
negotiating with its leaders was, in their opinion, a futile exercise.
These people may think that the Iranians do not have the
right to hold an opinion on this subject or any other, for that matter. The
evidence pointing to this reality is that they acted throughout the
negotiations as if they could tell their President what choices he must impose
on the Iranians who will then have to accept their dictates or be bombed into
oblivion. Period; end of discussion.
Moreover, what must have felt like sacrilegious to these
people was the possibility that the Iranians had given themselves the right to
distrust (not so much the Americans but) the Americans who came under the
control of Jews. Looking at all this, and connecting the dots, we cannot escape
the reality that distrust of the other was common to both sides. It is that the
Jews distrust the Iranians for no reason at all, whereas the Iranians have
every reason in the world to distrust an America that's under the control of
Jews.
The Obama administration may have started to negotiate with
the Iranians not knowing how much the feeling of distrust ran on their side
too. With time, however, the American team came to realize that the Iranians
are motivated the same as everyone else and that they respond to provocations
in a similar fashion. This caused the administration to treat them like everybody
else. And given that the hate-Iran machine was going full blast in America
demonizing them, the Obama team was forced to tell the American people about
the reality of the Iranian character. This made the administration sound like a
lawyer defending his Iranian client.
This being the background against which America and its
allies have been negotiating with the Iranians, forging the accord that they
did was no easy matter. For someone like Senator Schumer to come now and oppose
it on the grounds that he does not trust the Iranians, is something that will
torpedo the deal, waste the considerable effort that went into it, and isolate
America more than it is now. What makes the Schumer stance even more galling is
that he is a Jew, and that America
saw its standing in the world diminish because it kept protecting Israel from the
wrath of a humanity that can no longer stand its in-your-face criminal
behavior.
Thus, every attempt that is made using any sort of excuse to
suggest that the nuclear deal with Iran can be altered or that it must be
scrapped, will be taken by the Iranians, by America's negotiating allies and by
the administration as an attempt to sink it the way that the Israelis have sunk
every deal the Americans helped them negotiate with the Palestinians.
The long and hard conclusion that must be drawn from all
this, is that while the Jews and their propaganda machine in America and
elsewhere will pretend to distrust the Iranians, humanity is already signaling
to the Jews that they will be held responsible for the consequences that will
follow if they take advantage of the mental retardation now plaguing the
American congress to kill that deal.
One attempt to do just that becomes apparent when studying
the article that came under the title: “Congress Can Rewrite the Iran Deal” and
the subtitle: “There is nothing unusual about doing this. The Senate has
required changes in more than 200 submitted treaties before giving its
consent.” It was written by Orde Kittrie and published on August 13, 2015 in
the Wall Street Journal.
To make his point, Kittrie begins by laying out a history of
the moments when the congress blocked, modified or approved a treaty subject to
conditions. Thus, he suggests that the congress can do likewise with this deal,
specifying what changes would be needed to meet its requirements. The result,
in his opinion, will be that: “Iran
and our negotiating partners should not be surprised if congress returns it
[the deal] to the president for renegotiation.”
No, they would not be surprised. However, while such a move
would have been something they might have accepted under normal circumstances,
something else will most certainly happen this time under the current abnormal
circumstances.
Let's be honest with ourselves and admit that because the
Jews are into it, nobody in the world will bet as much as a hair that this
thing will unfold normally. It hasn't until now, and it won't after the
unwarranted rejection.
The truth is that nobody, but nobody trusts a Jew today
anymore than humanity did throughout the centuries. Kittrie or no Kittrie,
Schumer or no Schumer, this deal is a take-it-or-leave-it proposition. Take it
and the world will be a better place. Leave it and Iran
will go its merry way while America
will sink further into the cesspool of Jewish irrelevance.