How can you tell that someone is emotionally disturbed? When
he accuses someone of a falsehood, and then builds an entire narrative around
it, complete with a prologue, a beginning, a middle, an end and also an
epilogue. After that, he may even add a little piece of his wisdom to top it
all off.
This is what Charles Tiefer has done when given a space in
Forbes Magazine to write a sickly little fantasy under the title: “Egypt Should
Get Over Its Irrational Denial That An ISIS Bomb Blew Up The Russian Airliner,”
published on November 18, 2015. You look through the article where or when Egypt might have denied it was a bomb, let alone
an ISIS bomb, and find none. You also look to
see where or when someone – aside from the recent Russian revelation – has
confirmed it was a bomb, and find none.
Tiefler says: “Officials from a number of Western
governments have stated that it was most likely an ISIS
bomb that blew up a Russian Metrojet charter plane.” First of all, “most
likely” does not mean confirmation. It means speculation which the Egyptians
flatly said they will not do because they are officially in charge of the
investigation … and professionals do not speculate. Second of all, neither
David Cameron nor Barack Obama said it might be an ISIS
bomb; they simply said it could have been a bomb.
As to the recent Russian revelation confirming that it was a
bomb, this is something that shows how the abuse of the tools of democracy by
the mentally retarded and the emotionally disturbed end up castrating the
democracies and fortifying their foes. Excessive speculation being an abuse of
freedom of speech, it did the “West” in when the likes of Tiefer speculated
that Putin is not admitting it was a bomb because he feared he'll be diminished
in the eyes of his adoring fans. And now, speculation has done the West in a
second time when Russia
revealed it was a bomb.
So you ask: How did that work out? Here is how: Time and
again, Putin has proven himself to be a master player in the geopolitical and
diplomatic chess game. When Russia
did the professional thing of not speculating about the Metrojet incident, the
retarded and the disturbed in the so-called democracies lulled their people
into believing that Russia
will now retrench and be quiet. Everybody was happy and took a snooze.
These people did not think how Putin might play the incident
to his advantage if and when he will have the chance. He then got lucky when
the terrorist attack on Paris
happened … and lo and behold, look what came of it; the Russians discovered
just now it was a bomb that brought down the Russian plane. And so, France and Russia
naturally forged a common cause that may be odds with how the Americans and the
rest of the NATO alliance may wish to proceed with the war that's raging in the
Levant .
This is how the Charles Tiefers of this world help castrate
their own system of governance when given a platform from which to say things
that are so perplexing about an Egypt that did nothing to hurt them, you wonder
what it is that motivates them to go way 'far out' as we used to say it in the
Seventies, to accomplish something that will do nothing more than stir up the
bile of other mentally retarded and other emotionally disturbed characters –
maybe even cause a few of them to hate Egypt for a day or two, then forget the
whole thing.
Look at this: “Egypt 's paranoid stance, on just
how the plane was downed, is amazing.” Now, think about it, my friend, how does
a professional that's doing an investigative job, who refuses to speculate
about the outcome of his work before it is completed, be thought of as
paranoid?
It is possible to imagine that a hate-filled Jew like Wolf
Blitzer would want to hire a team of pundits who will discharge tons of venom
in a CNN studio, in the hope that this will hurt Egypt in retaliation for not
letting Moses rob more of the Pharaoh's gold before fleeing into the desert –
several thousand years ago – but why does Tiefer express so much hatred for
Egypt?
And why is the editor of Forbes Magazine giving him a
platform from which to hurt the very system that is allowing his publication to
exist and to thrive?