Almost half a century ago Israel
occupied the Land of Palestine militarily, and the Jews set out to occupy
the nation of America
culturally. The effect on both peoples can now be gauged, and the preliminary
report cannot evade telling how strikingly similar those effects look like in
the two places.
Of course, volumes will have to be written now and in the
future before a complete picture can be painted of the transformation that took
place among the peoples of Palestine and America during
that half century. To achieve all that, much research will have to be conducted
in all areas of the humanities, even such areas of science as psychology,
psychiatry and brain research.
In the interim, however, we have a way to get a glimpse of
what the complete picture will look like in the eyes of future generations when
they will be studying our times. The way is provided by the reflections we may
capture from analyzing the article that Dennis Prager wrote under the title “Stand
with Israel
by Visiting Israel,” published on November 10, 2015 in National Review Online.
Before anything, we must recall three important realities.
The first is that from 1967 – when Israel 's
army first entered the West Bank of the Jordan River
– to something like 15 years later, the Israelis found the Palestinians to be a
highly civilized, highly cultured and highly tamed people. But 15 years of
Jewish culture imposed on the Palestinians began to have an effect on the
younger generation. Realizing that their elders were powerless to do anything
that will give them a future worth having, young Palestinians began to break
away from the civilized, cultured, tamed but also ineffective older generation.
They started to mimic the rough treatment that the soldiers of occupation were
imposing on them, and gradually intensified their behavior with the passage of
time.
The second reality is that the occupation has turned Palestine into an
enclosure where people are kept in conditions worse than those of a zoo. This
is because there are checkpoints everywhere in Palestine whereas none exist in a pasture or
a cage at the zoo. In fact, for three generations, most Palestinians would not
have left the village in which they were born. All that they see, hear and learn
as they grow up is nothing but the Jewish culture that put them in this
condition.
Thus, the behavior that these kids display is the product,
not of the Palestinian culture of three generations ago, but of the Jewish
culture they are force-fed today. They are Christian and Muslim kids who are,
in effect, as Jewish as the “Sabras” who were born in Israel, and more Jewish
than the newcomers or the foreign recruits who came to experience the thrill of
killing Palestinians, and get a pat on the back for it.
The third reality is that the Jews are notorious for being
tone-deaf. What they start – in Palestine
or elsewhere – always acquires the characteristics of a ballistic projectile.
No matter what happens after the launch, the Jews never have a plan B that
would guide, terminate, modify or recall the projectile. On the contrary, if
you point out the need for something to change course, they take this as a
personal rebuke, and double down on what they started.
To do that and get away with it in a place like America , the
Jews first monopolize the discussion by accusing those who oppose them of being
antisemitic. What they do next to justify all their decisions, is that they put
out streams of contradictions that quickly become transparent to the public at
large. This infects the culture on which they live a parasitic life, and begins
to transform it into something resembling the culture they impose on the people
of Palestine .
We may now look at the Dennis Prager article and see what's
in it that may shock future generations as much as they will be by the Israeli
occupation of Palestine .
Prager begins the article by saying that he is in Israel to stand with that nation
and make a difference. He had to do this, he says, because the Palestinian kids
are unhappy with their situation and are misbehaving.
Being the tone-deaf Jew that he is, he does not try to
understand those kids. Instead, he distorts the reality of their situation by
attributing their behavior – not to their upbringing under Jewish culture and
Jewish military rule – but to the Palestinian culture from which they were
removed three generations ago. Imagine a kid in America
stabbing someone, and Prager blaming that behavior on his great grandparents
who came to America from Ireland . You
would think this guy is a mental case, would you not?
Being the mental case Jew that he is, Prager bites the hand
that feeds him. Talking to parents, he says this: “You should send your
college-age son or daughter to Israel .
Nothing can inoculate a young person against the morally distorted ideas he or
she will be subjected to at every American college as does a prolonged visit to
Israel … Young people will come to realize how broken the university's moral
compass is.”
In other words, he says that the kids in occupied America are as bad as the kids in occupied Palestine . What he does
not say is that the two sets of kids are products of Jewish culture. Those in Palestine have no weapons with which to mass massacre each
other; those of America
have lots of guns and ammunition to mass-massacre each other in schools and in
movie theaters.