Two nations on Planet Earth currently live under colonial
rule. They are Palestine and America , both
of which suffer from the indignity of being governed by Jews without their
consent.
The people of Palestine
suffer because their freedom has been taken away through the physical
restrictions imposed on them by military means. The people of America suffer
because their freedom has been taken away through the political, cultural,
psychological and financial restrictions imposed on them by legal and
informational means, in addition to the traditional means of intimidation.
A great deal is known as to how the colonial powers used to
enforce their rule on the people they victimized because this Planet has had a
colonial history that lasted more than a century. In fact, many of the
victimizing methods that were used then are used today in Palestine . This is true even if such methods
were modified in ways that allow the Jews to be more genocidal than ever
before, while giving themselves the opportunity to argue that the Palestinians
are to blame for what happens to them.
When you ask what may have inspired those modifications, you
get an answer from observing how the Jews maintain the people of America on a
leash. It is that they discovered what methods work in America , and took those methods to Palestine , blending them
with the ones they inherited from the old colonial powers. They enforced the
infernal mix on the indigenous people of Palestine ,
giving this occupation the most hideous look to have ever revolted the entire
population of the Planet.
Thus, beside the checkpoints, the travel restrictions and
the collective punishments that the Jews inflict regularly on the Palestinians,
they also practice the modern version of divide and rule which differs from the
old version in that the colonized people are no longer divided along religious
or ethnic lines but along ideological lines. You can see the effect of this
method in the Federal and State congresses, for example.
These are places that remain paralyzed and neutralized
because the various ideological factions were taught to get on each others'
throat when the time to discuss the business of America is rung. They get back to normal;
even go on a fast-track when the time to discuss the business of Israel
and the Jews is announced.
Worse, that method is implemented not only in the
legislatures of the nation, but also in the places where the Jews see benefit
to themselves in dividing the American people, and ruling over them more
tightly. One place they are currently trying to reconquer is the world of
academe. You can see how they navigate their way in this area by reviewing the
piece they wrote under the title: “The New Campus Dissenters,” an editorial
that also came under the subtitle: “Not everyone is cowed by political
intimidation at universities.” It was published in the Wall Street Journal on November 27,
2015.
The subject they discuss is the turmoil that's now gripping
the university campuses of America .
Typical of what happens when the time is ripe to call for change, groups of
students had demanded that the faculties and administrators of several colleges
change their ways. The response, according to the editors of the Journal, was
that “most have caved like wet cardboard.” Well, aside from the inappropriate
language, there is nothing new in acceding to the demands of students. It
happens all the time, everywhere, and will happen again and again.
But that's not how the Jewish editors of the Wall Street
Journal saw things. To them, the most important development was that a group of
students “dissented” from the ideas of their peers. Seeing an ideological crack
among the students, the first thing that came to the mind of the Journal
editors, was to exploit the phenomenon and help widen the crack instead of
letting the campus drama play itself out – which is how things unfold normally
everywhere in the world, absent a Jewish influence. But the Jews are in America , and
they hunger to take control of academe … and so they divide in the hope that
they will soon be able to conquer.
The way that the exploitative hands played the game this
time was to call the dissenting students politically courageous, and do the
most disgusting thing that a bunch of editors can do: they suggested that
someone in a position of power might be tempted to abuse their power and punish
the students. Look what the cowardly editors did: “The students signed their
names, and we hope their professors don't dock their grades.”