A never asleep Hate Machine spewing again

The JHM-NYT axis is at it again. That would be the twinning of the Jewish Hate Machine and the New York Times, still hollering their pain as the two demons see Egypt continue to make steady progress, and there is nothing they can do to sabotage the good work.

This time, they came up with an article under the title: “Our Mediterranean, Our Survival,” written by D. Rachael Bishop and published on January 30, 2016 in the NY Times. It is almost an identical duplicate of the article that came under the title: “Under the Ships in the Suez Canal,” written by Juli Berwald and published on November 13, 2014, also in the NY Times. My response to that article came on the same day under the title: “The Floodgate of Jewish Hate and Envy”.

Note the change in tone between the two NY Times titles. Fifteen months ago, they used a descriptive title to inform the reader what the article was about. In fact, it was about the migration of fish through the Suez Canal, going from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean. When that badmouthing of Egypt did not work, and the country widened the Canal in record time as promised, the demonic JHM-NYT axis resorted to hollering that they fear for their survival. The jokers have played their ultimate Jewish card: crying out the Existential refrain.

The fact is that the Suez Canal is a North-South waterway and not an East-West waterway. This makes it so that the sea level in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Red Sea are always at the same level despite the rotation of the Earth, and the revolution of the Moon around it. This means there was never a need to install locks along the Suez Canal similar to what was done along the Panama Canal.

Also, the fresh water Bitter Lakes that existed at Ismailia between the city of Port Fouad on the Mediterranean Sea, and the city of Suez on the Red Sea, were bound to disappear as they did a long time ago because they were too small compared to the size of the two salty seas. When the waterway was opened decades ago, the Lake waters started immediately to mix with those of the Seas and became a part of the salty system.

Thus, what Bishop is saying: “Previous expansions and agricultural wastewater dumped into the canal flushed it away,” is worse than a big lie; it is a Jewish lie. The truth is that there has never been agriculture on either side of the Canal, and there will not be for a long time because the entire area is a desert that's too far away from the Nile Valley where Egypt’s agriculture is concentrated.

As to the expansions of the Canal a quarter of a century ago, and again six years ago; they did nothing to change the salinity of the Ismailia Lake – what used to be the Bitter Lakes. That's because the Canal has been around for nearly a century and a half. In fact, suggestions were floated to the effect that Egypt should construct a pipeline from the fields of the Delta to Ismailia, and dump the agricultural wastewater produced there into the Lake, thus turn it into a barrier that will prevent the Red Sea fishes from migrating to the Mediterranean.

But that idea is now considered a bad Jewish joke for a reason that was revealed inadvertently by none other than D. Rachael Bishop herself. Look what she says: “It [the Canal] opens a path for invasive species from the Indian and Pacific Oceans to flood through the Red Sea into the Mediterranean.” As disgustingly primitive as this is, it is also comical because you cannot help but visualize two fishes half a world away in the Pacific Ocean talk to each other.

The antisemitic fish tells the other: Guess what, my friend. The Egyptians have widened the Suez Canal, so now we can go through the South China Sea, the Java Sea, the Gulf of Thailand, the Andaman Sea, the Indian Ocean, the Gulf of Aden, the Red Sea and a Suez Canal that is wide enough for both of us to pass through, thus get to the Mediterranean Sea where we'll bug the hell out of those darn Jews occupying Palestine. Neat, huh!

Sick Jewish jokes aside, what is it that bothers those clowns? Here is the answer: “the $8.5 billion project will increase toll revenue from $5.3 billion to $13.2 billion.” And so, in the same way that they used America's good name to “educate” the nations of the Nile Basin on how to blackmail Egypt and force it to pay for the Nile water it receives, they are now trying to make Egypt incur unnecessary expenses to fix a problem that isn't there.

And in the same way that they shed tears over the building of the Aswan Dam for several generations, expect to see them shed tears about the expanded Canal for several more generations. They are hopeless.