Snitching used to be associated with the Communist countries
... known to have followed George Orwell's idea of 'Big Brother' prying into
the private lives of its citizens. Governments in those places used to commission
ordinary citizens, expecting them to look into the affairs of everyone around
them, and report on anything that looked suspicious. Needless to say that the
program was dropped when Communism was discarded in those countries.
And then it happened that the “Liberal Democracies” of the
West found it necessary to put in place a similar program. To this end, they
called on their citizens to do what those of the Communist countries used to
do. In America ,
they named the program “See something, say something” to give the impression
that it was different from the Communist snitching of an earlier era. But
everyone knows that it is the same old vinegar in a bottle that is now labeled
new wine.
At this time, the Americans have their program so well
entrenched in the culture that the Jewish publications of the nation were
enticed to do what the Jews always do, which is to exploit the program by
distorting its purpose and applying the distortion where it was never meant to
go. You can see how this works when you read the article that came under the
title: 'See Something, Do Nothing' and the subtitle: “Germans and Americans
Turn a Blind Eye to Muslims' Crimes.” It was written by John Fund and published
on January 14, 2016 in National Review Online (NRO).
The author picks on a handful of incidents that happened in America ;
incidents in which someone had seen something and failed to report on it for
fear of being called a racist or some such thing. Tragedies that could have
been avoided were the result, he says – caused by a regime of self-censorship
spawned by the political correctness which is sweeping the nation at this time.
What he did not say is that for everyone of these incidents, thousands of
others were investigates, and hundreds from among these led to action that
avoided what may or may not have been a tragedy in the making.
Because that narrative alone does not constitute an argument
that would convince anyone something more could be done but is not being done,
John Fund found it necessary to discuss incidents that happened long ago, or
that happened in far away places. And so, he brought up what happened in Germany a few weeks ago, and what happened in Britain more
than a year ago.
The way he introduced these two situations tells you why the
authorities in America and Europe have their eyes less on such incidents and more on
the reporting of them. Look what Fund did. He mentioned a settlement that
involved Muslims and the NYPD. He juxtaposed to that what happened in Germany by
perpetrating a falsehood that bears the signature of the Jewish propaganda
machine. He said this: a mob of thousands of men – largely of “Arab or North
African origin – sexually assaulted German women...
The truth is that none of these men were from North Africa . They were mostly from East Asia (Pakistan ), and a few were from West Asia (Syria ) which,
unfortunately, happens to be Arabic speaking. John Fund also hid the fact that
they were drunken young men, which means they were not Muslim or were
individuals that no longer followed the teachings of their religion. Another
shocking reality is that these guys committed theft. Well, it is well known
that Islam does not look favorably at the hand that steals. These guys must
have been outlaws both from the legal and the religious points of view.
What they did was bad. But they would not have done it were
they truly Muslims, and in their right mind. Meanwhile, the choice facing the
authorities in Germany
was to treat the molehill they saw for what it is, or let the Jewish lie and
propaganda machine inflate it into a mountain. They chose wisely, and this is
why American publications that exist to incite war on Islam – such as NRO – are
unhappy.
As to what happened in Britain, the more that is said about
it, the more it becomes clear that the Pakistani men who had sexual relations
with young women, were simply the Johns who paid for sexual services rendered
by “sexual workers” that might be considered under-aged in North America but
not in Britain. And if someone must be punished for the practice, it will have
be the White pimps who made those girls available to the Johns, and lived on
the avails of prostitution.