Thursday, January 28, 2016

That's what they call World War III?

Before the Jews had managed to gain full control of America and make it their own in the eyes of the world, they used to cry out that if America did not get involved in the affairs of the Middle East and protect Israel, World War III will be set off, and we're all going to die.

When, as a result of these scary utterances, the Jewish Establishment managed to subjugate the American Congress of zombies and make it work exclusively for Israel, the Jews started saying that the occupation of Palestine was a non-issue; a dead subject that does not merit the attention of anyone … except maybe that something could be done to starve the Palestinians till they agree to follow in the footsteps of the American zombies and allow themselves to be subjugated by the Jews.

But now that the Jews have succeeded beyond their dream in getting the American military to destabilize several countries in the region, thus cause the humongous chaos they thought was going to benefit them but did not, the Jewish Establishment has finally understood that its plan has failed because it was a bad idea from the start.

The plan did not work because the unintended consequences created a situation that has the potential to turn nasty against Israel. So now, the Jews want the world to believe that World War III is knocking at the door of the Planet if it has not already started. And they warn that if America did not get involved in Middle Eastern affairs to protect Israel, things will get worse and we're all going to die. The old refrain is new again.

That is the gist of the article which came under the title: “Skirmishes on the Indian front” and the subtitle: “Cunning Jihadis act locally while thinking globally.” It was written by Clifford D. May and published on January 26, 2016 in The Washington Times. The author begins his presentation by chiding the media for reflecting Obama's view that it is “over the top to suggest we're engaged in World War III”.

May's view is that we are; and he has the numbers to prove it. Mind you, he does not say that World War III is here because of what is happening in occupied Palestine; it is here, he says, because of what is happening to the East of Palestine. Thus, you must rest assured that the occupation of Palestine remains a non-issue; a dead subject that does not merit the attention of anyone … except maybe that something could be done to starve the Palestinians till they agree to follow in the footsteps of the American zombies and allow themselves to be subjugated by the Jews.

Let's now look at the Clifford May's numbers. He says that attacks are ongoing near the border separating India and Pakistan. So far, the tally in dead and wounded is as follows: (1) three members of India's security forces and four attackers were killed. (2) Three Indians were injured, and two more attackers were killed. (3) At least twenty-two Pakistanis were killed in a university shooting reminiscent of what happens regularly in America.

The total comes to 31 dead and 3 injured on all sides. Believe it or not, that was enough for Clifford May to view the skirmishes in the Far East as the advent of World War III. He did so even though he views the encounters in occupied Palestine as a non-issue despite the fact that something like 170 people were killed and hundreds more were injured on both sides in the same period of time.

Now, when you consider that the various populations in occupied Palestine amount to 8 million people, and that the populations in India/Pakistan amount to 1.6 billion, you realize that there are 200 times as many people in India/Pakistan as in Palestine. Thus, when you work out the proportions, you discover that the 170 dead people in Palestine would amount to the equivalent of 34,000 dead people in India/Pakistan. But there were only 31 dead people in the Far East, and our author says it's enough to qualify as World War III.

Clifford May says he connected the dots because he is prone to doing so, and this led him to conclude that 170 dead people in Palestine constitute a non-issue whereas 31 dead in the Indian subcontinent constitute the kind of “World War” that Western leaders don't understand. This forces him to lament that “they [Western leaders] are unlikely to formulate policies to fight it.”

Which is why he believes that “for the jihadis, that must be a source of great encouragement.” Maybe Clifford May and all those like him need to take lessons in logic before writing articles as complex as that.