The “Situation” is a Jewish concept in social engineering
they are experimenting with in occupied Palestine .
Sooner or later the Jews will consider the concept to have been perfected, and
will work to adapt it for a stealthy implementation in the Anglophile countries
where they already have a leg up. That's because those countries have always
tolerated the Jewish social experimentation.
Helping the Jews succeed in this endeavor, are the editors
of the New York Times who already began to peddle the Jewish idea smoothly and
insidiously. Their aim is both to gain America 's
blessing for the implementation of the concept in Palestine , and to pave the way for its
implementation in the Anglophile nations. The editors did this much in the
piece they wrote under the title: “The Fading Two-State Solution,” published on
Jan. 23, 2016.
In Palestine ,
the Israelis are well on their way to having the experiment fully implemented.
In fact, it was written about in the North American publications on several
occasions, the last I know of being the article that the former ambassador to
the U.S., Michael Oren wrote under the title: “Israelis, Palestinians and the
'Two-State Situation,'” and the subtitle: “Instead of demanding what each side
cannot do, we must ask what each side can do – and then make the most of it,”
published on Feb. 25, 2015 in the Wall Street Journal.
But what exactly are the editors of the New York Times
doing? Well, see for yourself. Look how they start the editorial: “Given the
brittle relations between the Obama administration and Israel ...” And
look how they end it: “With only a year left in office, President Obama is
unlikely to make another run at a peace process or even apply serious pressure
on Israel
to halt settlement-building.” With that, they signal what they wish to see
happen by pretending it is what they predict will happen. It’s a trick as
Jewish as matzoh bread.
But that's harking back to the old Judeo-Israeli demand that
went this way: “Give us the tools and we'll do the job [of killing Arabs and
Muslims.]” It is a plea for the Jewish lobby in America
to make sure that come hell or high water, the Obama Administration will
continue to give Israel
unconditional diplomatic support worldwide, give it money, money, money and
give it lethal weapons. And do all these things while asking for nothing in
return – that's absolutely nothing in return.
But how do you renew a demand of that magnitude without
setting off alarm bells that will shake the American Administration to its
core? That's not to mention the echo that will reverberate all the way to a
European Union which already thinks of Israel as a massive social
laboratory not different from the biological one set up by Joseph Mengele where
he determined that the Jews were an inferior race. The difference between
Mengele and Israel 's
rulers, however, is that the latter have learned to avoid uttering words like
those of Mengele by convincing the likes of Mitt Romney to say things for them
in return for a million dollars.
And the way that the editors of the Times are renewing the
old demand is by writing a seemingly balanced editorial while insidiously
advancing the poisonous ideas that made it possible for the Jewish lobby to
torpedo what could have been accomplished at Annapolis even before the current
administration had taken office.
Thus, instead of starting the editorial by asserting that
the occupation of Palestine is the problem we must end before considering
anything else, the editors start with this: “Considering the relentless
violence and attacks on Israel's very existence, Israelis are understandably
[that's understandably] on high alert to defend themselves.”
And that, my friend, has always been the killer of sensible
progress in Palestine .
Every time that those words were uttered by American officials, the Jews
pocketed the idea and walked away from everything else. But they continued to
demand that America give Israel
unconditional diplomatic support worldwide, give it money, money, money and
give it lethal weapons. And do all these things while asking for nothing in
return – that's absolutely nothing in return.
What they are doing now in Jewish occupied Palestine , is implement a system of
governance in a one-state “situation” that looks Liberal and Democratic on the
surface, but in reality sets the Jews as the permanent governing race, and the
Palestinians as permanent subordinates.
Not coincidentally, this happens to be the model that the
Old Testament is promising the Jews will happen not only in Palestine but in the whole world. It is also
what the Jews are close to achieving in the “tolerant” Anglophile nations,
having monopolized all the key institutions already.
And the Jews reckon that if they fully succeed in Palestine
with America’s help and blessing, thus gain widespread recognition, they will be
able to push the envelop further in the Anglophile world, and subordinate it
like they do in occupied Palestine. Their dream is to pull this thing off so as
not to repeat the blunder they once committed in the French Canadian Province
of Quebec.