It used to be acceptable to say “Mussolini ran the trains on
time but...” You cannot say that anymore because when you speak of Mussolini or
someone like Hitler or any other character of the sort, you can only say bad
things about them, and not associate them with something that might sound
positive even to the slightest. This is political correctness and the
mutilation of history wrapped into one package.
Mutilating history has been around since the days of Moses
... if there ever was such a character or the events which are associated with
him. As to political correctness, its expression has acquired full force when
half a century ago the Jews began to seed the American culture with elements
that neutralized all opposition to the machinations they were employing in the
effort to control America's levers of power.
By the time that the second decade of the Twenty First
Century had rolled, political correctness was frowned upon in North
America , and a drive to counter it was started in the media. This
is when the inevitable happened. It is that the Jews took advantage of that
development, rallying around the banner of the neoconservative (neocon)
movement, and declaring open season on those they did not like, especially the
Muslims.
At the same time, however – in their effort to have it both
ways – the Jews created a new category they called “hate speech” under which
they stacked every sort of criticism that would mention Israel or the Jews, and
made it taboo. This move led to the polarization of the debate, with the media
carrying the pro-Jewish arguments, and academe giving shelter to the opposing
arguments.
When it came to Israeli and Jewish interests, the media did
not break along the ideological divide anymore than the political stage had. In
fact, both the neocons (disguised as Evangelicals or mainstream Conservatives)
and the Progressives of the Left, amplified the Jewish arguments – each looking
at the same thing through its own ideological prism, seeing something different
yet reaching the same conclusion: What is Jewish or Israeli is good; what is
neither Jewish nor Israeli is bad.
The result has been an American Right that supported the
hardline policies of Israel ,
and demanding that America
follow a similar path. As to the leftist movement, it attacked the fictitious
right-wing tendencies of the foreign nations that happened to be hated by Israel on any
given day. This being an ever shifting occurrence, you could not foretell who
they will want you to love and who to hate come tomorrow morning.
A Jewish style intimidating confusion set in; one that
damned you for saying A instead of B, and damned you for saying B instead of A.
Thus, everybody preferred to shut up while the Jews got louder and louder for,
they had monopolized America
as planned, and were shouting their glory from its rooftops.
And then, the year 2015 rolled. This meant that a new season
of presidential politics was upon us. A dozen and a half right wing candidates
ran for the top job, each trying to outdo the other at demonstrating that he or
she was the most adept at pandering to the Jewish lobby. But they all learned
something unexpected; they learned that this time, pandering to the Jews had
become the moral equivalent of kissing Hitler's ass.
The neocons were the first to get the drift of that trend,
and they hurried to cover their tracks. You can see how they started going down
this path in the article that came under the title: “The term 'Neocon' Has Run
Its Course,” written by Jonah Goldberg and published on January 6, 2016 in
National Review Online.
Goldberg begins the article by mentioning that the
candidates running to be president are talking about the neocons. Because the
term had come to mean warmonger “if not warmongering Jewish advisers,” he
decided to set the historical record straight ... in the Jewish fashion.
He admits that the neocons have been hawkish at one time,
and that the advice they gave to topple dictators, ended up helping terrorists
and extremists. But he hastens to say that the neocons were not always like
that. To prove it, he explains that they were disillusioned intellectuals who
were interested mainly in domestic affairs.
Sensing that very few people care about the angelic past of
the neocons when their present-day advice is what has led to the hellish
situation now unfolding in the Levant ,
Goldberg shifted to another tack. He blamed it all on someone else. He writes
the following to make that point: “the neocons were far from outliers in their
belief that the U.S.
should use its military power abroad. Many members of both parties held that
view … it was Bill Clinton who signed the Iraq Liberation Act calling for
regime change.”
And that's exactly my point. The use of political
correctness and mutilation of history had allowed the Jews to restructure America in such a way as to serve Israel and the
Jews at the expense of the American people. This is why pandering to the Jews
by the Left or by the Right, has become the moral equivalent of kissing Hitler's
ass.
It looks like the American people who lost so much for the
Jews to gain as much, are finally waking up to the reality of their human
condition under Jewish dictatorship.