There was a time during the reign of Begin and Shamir – both
of whom spoke English with a heavy East European accent – when we used to hear
the biblical expression: “we'll break their bones.” It was the promise and the
threat they and their people made regularly to scare the Palestinian kids who
were fighting for their freedom battling the Israeli occupation of their
homeland.
After a while, someone told the two characters, it sounds
bad in English when the Prime Minister of Israel speaks in such vivid terms to
scare kids who have nothing to fight with but bare hands and stones, standing
up to tanks and helicopter gunships equipped with machine guns and cluster
bombs. Driven and piloted by killers, those death machines and their occupants
were out in force killing Palestinians and looting their properties. Not only
did the Israeli military go after the kids in their domain, it went after them
in Lebanon
where the military made it a hobby to target the Palestinian refugee camps,
murdering men, women and children in cold blood.
That's when everyone who is a red-blooded human being could
not help but try to visualize what the Jews were seeing in their mind's eyes
when they promised to break the bones of those they were out to rob. It is only
now, decades later, that Clifford D. May has offered to help in this regard. He
did it by giving a vivid description of what the Jews were seeing when they
spoke as they did. May volunteered to help in an article he wrote under the title:
“A bloody day in London
town” and the subtitle: “The ideologies driving the carnage can't be fought
until they are understood,” published on March 28, 2017 in The Washington
Times.
Here is what he wrote, apparently quoting someone anonymous:
“smashing their bodies with the vehicle's strong outer frame while advancing
forward – crushing their heads, torsos, and limbs under the vehicles wheels and
chassis.” And that's not to mention the machine-gun bullets and the bombs that
did a hundred times more damage than a single vehicle that's out of control.
The thing, however, is that Clifford May was not describing what the Israeli
military had been doing in Palestine and Lebanon ; he was describing what happened when
someone drunk and high on drugs, drove a car into a crowd in the city of London .
The reason why Clifford May wrote that article was to say
that the driver of the vehicle was a recent convert to Islam, therefore it must
be that something about Islam makes people commit this sort of crimes. He
neglected to say that the man lived a life of drugs and alcohol in defiance of
Islam's teachings. And the reason why May omitted these facts is that to reveal
them would have led to the conclusion that being defiant of Islam in the way
that he lived, it must be that he committed his ultimate crime also in defiance
of Islam – not because of it.
So, the question to ask is this: Could it be that the
British born man who committed the atrocity in London
was motivated by the same sort of sentiment that drove a Jewish American to
call Jewish centers in America ,
Canada and Australia , and
threaten them with bombs? It is clear that the Jew was trying to frame the
White supremacists or the Muslims. By the same token, could it be that the
convert to Islam was actually a hater of both Islam and Christianity, and that
he sought by his action to start a war between them? This would have duplicated
the atrocity of the man that gunned down a number of Black worshipers in a
church basement in America .
The reason why we're not getting anywhere near understanding
what motivates these individuals is that the coverage of the news about them is
badly skewed. In fact, the difference between the normal coverage of such
incidents, and the coverage that involves Jews or Muslim impersonators is so
stark, no one can miss seeing it.
Look what happened with the American Jew. It did not take
two minutes after catching him to explain that despite the sophistication of
his scheme, the man was said to suffer – not just from a mental illness – but from
a tumor that was affecting his judgment. Pity him. It is that when the culprit
is a Jew, they always find an excuse to absolve him. They did so by labeling
eccentric the Australian Jew that tried to burn a mosque in Jerusalem . Pity him. And they did it when an
Israeli doctor went into a mosque at prayer time, and machine-gunned dozens of
worshipers. The excuse they had for him was that the pressure of his profession
got the better of him. Pity him.