Hardly a day goes by without being hit with a number of
Jewish-inspired new articles, and neither is it possible to read any of these
articles without encountering a charge of antisemitism leveled against someone.
In the manner that opens Sesame's door to unlimited treasures,
throwing the antisemitic accusation has served as the key that used to open
America's treasure chest to the Jews, and they helped themselves like there was
no tomorrow. But then, the chest began to empty, and the Jews panicked. It is
why they are frantically calling out the magic word 'antisemitism' at every
turn; doing it in the hope of seeing a glittering scintilla that may indicate there
is still gold at the bottom of the chest.
This is what Victor Davis Hanson is doing in the column he wrote
under the title: “The New, New Anti-Semitism,” and the subtitle: “Old
stereotypes resurface among today's woke progressives,” published on January
15, 2019 in National Review Online.
When a nefarious phenomenon keeps recurring under every
conceivable circumstance, normal people stop looking among the circumstances as
to why this is happening, and look instead at the origin of the phenomenon. The
same logic should apply to the phenomenon that Victor Hanson and others call
“anti-Semitism.” In fact, the Hanson column this time, is nothing but a
compilation of circumstances under which antisemitism has manifested itself
throughout time. The problem is that Hanson has failed to mention the Jewish
role that’s at the origin of the phenomenon. He only chose to observe and to
describe how the expression of the phenomenon kept adapting with the changing
times.
The reality is that two factors are at play in this never-ending
occurrence. There is a human nature that's adaptive, but only to the point
where it can no longer endure a discomfort, after which it lashes out with fury
at the causes of that discomfort. And there is the Jewish ideology that's
fundamentally predatory but shifty enough to appear so vulnerable, it is
frequently invited into the places where it starts to ravage the property of the
benevolent who believed were rescuing it.
Human nature and the Jewish ideology having been the main
characters on the stage of human existence, they each played its proper role
since the time when the species settled down and began to devise the complex
sets of protocols that were followed in the maintenance of the relationships
that arose among individuals and among groups of them.
As time moved on, and life evolved from the primitives to the
explorers, the builders, the warriors, the Dark Ages, the Renaissance, the Age
of Reason and modern times, the appearance of human existence on Planet Earth
kept changing. But during all that time, the two main characters on the stage
remained the same throughout. They played the game differently from era to era,
compelled as they were to adapt to the changing circumstances, but the
fundamentals of human nature and those of Jewish ideology remained constant.
This says that anyone who is serious about understanding the
phenomenon of antisemitism, should search for answers among those fundamentals,
and not among the evolving expressions of the phenomenon as they kept adapting
to the changing times. Thus, having made the wrong choice, Victor Hanson only
managed to add one more chapter to the many that were compiled already. They
all describe the natural human reactions that were triggered by the
provocations of the Jewish ideology, and nothing more profound than that.
After describing the histrionics of the past, Victor Hanson went
on — as uselessly as ever — to speculate about the histrionics of the future.
Here is a small sample of that: “We have seen an emerging new, new
anti-Semitism. It is likely to become far more pernicious than both the
old-right and the new versions because it has become deeply embedded in popular
culture and accepted as cool among America's historically ignorant youth”.
And this is where we are forced to do a little speculation of our
own regarding what the Jews will try to do next. In fact, it will not be
something new; it will only be recalling something they have openly belabored
for decades. The memory haunting us concerns the reality that the Jews will most
certainly point to the new circumstances and argue that the history of the Holocaust
must be taught — in the way that they teach histrionics — to every North
American toddler and adult from kindergarten to graduate school.
They will want the pupils and the students to know by heart the
name of every Jew that was sent to his or her death, but nothing about the
fundamentals as to why it all happened or what to do to make sure it does not
happen again.