When the rabbis of half a century ago managed to
convince the political elites of America and their Evangelical halfwits that
the Jews were chips off the divine block, put on Earth and charged with the
task of guiding humanity to a perfect existence, the elites worshiped the Jews
and considered every word they uttered a dogma that cannot be questioned,
doubted or refuted. As you can imagine, the situation was sweet for these Jews
while it lasted.
Having used and abused the joyful atmosphere that the
early rabbis created in celebration of America's transformation, the second and
third generation disciples of the rabbis now find themselves deprived of what
would have engendered some respect for them among the political elites. With
this loss also came the inability of the latter-day disciples to exploit the
naivete of the Americans.
In fact, the new generation of disciples finds it
difficult to utter contrived narratives these days, and see the Americans take
them at face value without question, skepticism or the desire to push back
assertively as they do on the nation's campuses. The reality is that the
disciples have a hard time putting out unsubstantiated allegations of the kind
which are regularly put out by the Jewish propaganda machine, and be taken
seriously. At best the narratives fall on deaf ears, at worst they provoke
derision and scorn.
An early disciple of the rabbis, and beneficiary of
the game when it was sweet to play, was Clifford D. May. He lasted long enough
to experience the transformation of the sweet taste in his mouth into the
bitter taste of push-back against his utterances. This is what makes his latest
article sound like something written––not with ink––but with melancholic bile
generated by the despair of being disbelieved at every turn.
Clifford May's latest article came under the title:
“Iran's rulers (still) seek nuclear weapons,” and the subtitle: “Yet more
evidence that those who despise us can't be bought off.” It was published on June
23, 2020 in The Washington Times.
Even as he tried to implore the political elites and
the public at large to please make the effort to believe that he is
intellectually honest and morally sincere, Clifford May wrote an article that
is riddled with intellectual dishonesty and moral insincerity. He made the
effort to be more subtle than usual on this occasion, but his slip is still
showing as you'll see in a minute.
The two areas in which the Jews have raised fuss about
Iran, being the financial and nuclear issues, this is where Clifford May plied
his ingenuity; and this is where you'll catch him try to deceive you. First,
the financial issue. Here is what May has said:
“The JCPOA was designed to put on ice the nuclear
weapons program for a few years. In exchange, the Islamic Republic received
hundreds of billions of dollars, and the promise that the river of funds would
continue to flow … Mr. Obama had faith that Iran's rulers, once in receipt of
his respect and US taxpayer cash, would decide they'd rather lead a nation”.
The truth here was deliberately kept hidden. Without
it and with the insertion of a lie that is difficult to detect, the message
relayed in that passage is as different from the truth as Harvey Weinstein's
lechery is different from Mother Theresa' chastity. Here is the truth: America
had orchestrated the freezing of Iranian bank accounts in America and several
other countries where the money sat for years earning interest.
With the conclusion of the Nuclear Deal, the Iranian
accounts were unfrozen and the money returned to its rightful owners. When it
came to the Americans doing what others had done, they hit a snag. It turned
out that under pressure from such clowns as Clifford May's entourage, the
American Congress of crackhead cockroaches had passed laws that made it
difficult for America to transfer money to Iran through the regular channels.
And so, the money was returned to Iran as regular banknotes. This done, the
Jewish propaganda machine made it sound like it was American taxpayer money
when in reality it was Iranian money plus the accumulated interest.
As to the nuclear issue, even though Clifford May
says, “We now have overwhelming evidence that the nuclear weapons development
program continues to progress,” you'll find nothing in his article to prove
this claim. What you'll find instead is a mountain of accusations that point to
no convincing evidence.
In fact, you'll find a whole bunch of gibberish that
seems to suggest Clifford May believes Iran is bad because it is evil like
Mother Theresa, whereas the enemies of Iran are good because they are virtuous
like Harvey Weinstein.
If this sounds like Jewish logic, it's because it is.
That's the way they like it, and there is nothing we can do about it.
In fact, someone more powerful than you or me has
tried to reform them but failed.