If you want to know how the peasants of a newly conquered
plantation think and behave, there are two pieces in the September 27, 2014
issue of the New York Times (NYT) that you can study. The first was written by
the Israeli Mairav Zonszein under the title: “How Israel Silences Dissent,” and
the other was written by the editors of the NYT under the title: “A Bad
Antiterrorism Bill” which has nothing to do with Israel, or the plantation that
is America, but has everything to do with preaching to others – this time the
French – what America desperately needs to have at home.
The first thing you need to know is that colonialism is an
adaptable beast, it changes both in tactics and strategy in such a way as to
secure the most effective grip it can have on its colonies. You can see how the
tactics worked when you study how the colonial powers treated each colony in
Africa and Asia . But when faced with large
chunks of land such as the Levant or the
Indian sub-continent, a more comprehensive strategy is used.
There is much of the latter that is being discussed these
days, given what is unfolding in the Middle East and Southeast
Asia . But what is neglected in all of this, is the way that World
Jewry has adapted that strategy and used it to turn America-Palestine into a
Jewish plantation. To be sure, the Palestinian part of the equation is
resisting the occupation whereas the American part remains confused about what
is going on even if the ground is beginning to swell with a seething anger that
promises to grow and someday become a factor important enough to be reckoned
with.
Look at this passage in the Zonszein article: “This has
allowed the us-versus-them mentality to bleed into Israeli Jewish society. 'Us'
no longer refers to any Jewish citizen, and 'them' to any Palestinian. Now,
'us' means all those who defend the status quo of occupation and settlement
expansion, including many Christian evangelicals and Republicans in America . And
'them' means anyone who tries to challenge that status quo, whether a rabbi, a
dissenting Israeli soldier or the president of the United States .”
How did it get to the point where a fanatic Jew of the
settlers variety can stand as master and pass judgment as to the worth of a
Palestinian that is engaged in civil disobedience, or an American President
that is engaged in running a superpower? Well, it happened because the Jewish
strategy is to view America
not as a single nation – though it does not get in the way of that image – but
as a conglomeration of institutions; some more strategic than others. The grand
strategy is to infiltrate and “own” the most important institutions, and add
them to the portfolio of the governing cabinet that is under the control of
World Jewry.
At this point in time, the American institutions most
valuable to the Jews would be the Evangelicals, the US Congress, the Republican
Party, the financial institutions, the portion of the military they still
control, the media and, of course, the intelligence gathering institutions that
spy on American citizens and give the information to Israel. These, along with
the Palestinian institutions that Israel has in its grip, make up the
plantation that “status quo” Israelis control as colonial masters.
And this situation has developed because the status quo Jews
were able to silence dissent in America
before turning on those who live in occupied Palestine
– what is called Israel
proper and what is called the territories. They did it by accusing those who
dissented of being antisemitic, and by ruining their lives and their careers.
They did it not only in full view of cowardly editors and publishers who did
not lift a finger to defend free speech in America but in cooperation with
them. Yes, my friend, the most powerful weapon used by Jews to kill free speech
in America
have been the guardians of free speech themselves. The same sordid history
applies in Canada ,
and I know it because I lived the experience for nearly half a century.