Sunday, September 28, 2014

Why America gets shafted all the Time

When you do something that is wrong you should always expect that you'll pay the price sooner or later. The weaker you are, the sooner you'll pay the price ... the stronger you are, the later you'll pay it. You can play tricks if you know how, and you may be able to postpone the day of reckoning but in the end, you'll pay the price because no one evades a punishment he earned.

The severity of the punishment you receive will depend on how bad your act has been, and the degree of malice with which you carried it out. At the opposite end of malice there is naivety; and many wrongful acts are committed by individuals, institutions or nations which are manipulated by bad characters. This describes America's situation well because America has always been shafted not because it set out to do bad things but because groups that begged for help often led it astray while receiving the help.

This made the affected people angry at America, and they responded by lashing out at the superpower. The most manipulative of the groups leading America astray have been the Jews whose antics invited the biggest punishment. It is that the Jews got the superpower to step on may toes believing it was helping the Jews when in fact, they did not need help but had an evil agenda to implement. The result has been that America paid the price for listening to them and worse, it got insulted by them as a thank you for not being vicious enough on others while helping them implement their agenda.

So the question: How does America get to be led astray by others in the first place? The answer is that the evil ones take advantage of the cultural principles that made America strong, turning these principles into weapons, and using them against America itself. Whereas there is recognition of the fact that democracy has ills in the saying: the ills of democracy are cured by more democracy, it must also be recognized that the ills of democracy can be aggravated by more democracy. And this was the big discovery that the self-appointed leaders of the Jews made; the one they used to score the successes that they did.

In fact, for more than half a century, the Jews have been using America's democracy to insidiously inject into the culture the notion that there are those who deserve to enjoy the fruits of democracy and those who don't. Little by little, they made it so that only the Jews had unlimited rights to the privileges of democracy whereas everyone else had the right to only one choice: either praise the Jews and everything they do, or shut up. The Jewish leaders achieved this level of success by threatening to sue anyone that made them feel “uncomfortable” saying slanderous things they construed to be antisemitic.

The idea was never to “educate” the public as to the sensitivities of the Jews – which is what they have been claiming – but to intimidate everyone that might be inclined to take up a subject touching on Jewish matters. One of the most notorious tricks used by them to achieve that end has come to light lately when an example erupted as to what constitutes something slanderous and antisemitic in their view. It was to say Jewish lobby instead of Israeli lobby, or to say Israeli lobby instead of Jewish lobby. No matter which way you said it, you were called slanderous because you should have said it the other way.

To someone who said it one way or the other expecting nothing, a resulting violent reaction coming out of nowhere and exploding on the scene, is enough to intimidate them. Pulling a trick of this nature for half a century, the Jews managed to make everyone who is not Jewish grovel while raising a generation of Jewish brats so spoiled, your dog would not bite them if they came to rob your property, for fear of being poisoned.

You can see an example of one such brat; one who was raised entirely in that climate, and growing to be a veritable daddy's boy. He is John Podhoretz whose latest expression came under the title: “A sign of promise from Obama on terror,” published on September 24, 2014 in the New York Post.

He ends the article by asking the question: “Can you win a war when the commander-in-chief is a political coward?” And this is the sort of attitude that will motivate the American people to start asking the kind of questions which people have asked about Jews throughout the planet and throughout time before deciding to take matters in their own hand and ridding themselves of a scourge they allowed to grow in their midst like a cancer that never stops metastasizing.