Lee Smith writes for the Weekly Standard, and he published
two short articles lately. The first came under the title: “New Biden National
Security Adviser OK with Iranian Nukes,” and was posted on the publication's website
on September 26, 2014. Two days later, on September 28, the same Lee Smith
posted on the same website an article under the title: “Biden's New National
Security Adviser Removed Jerusalem from Dem Platform.”
What this says immediately to the alert reader is that on
September 26, Lee Smith did not know what the new Biden National Security
Adviser had done with regard to Jerusalem ,
or had forgotten. By the time two days had passed, he must have received
information from correspondents to the effect that the man in question – Colin
Kahl – was not only OK with Iranian nukes, but also responsible for removing Jerusalem from the
Democratic platform. And this is when he wrote and posted the second article.
Let's leave out the debate concerning the Iran nuclear
issue for now because what must be the focus of our attention at this time is
the rape of American democracy by a Jewish publication and those who write for
it. In the article of September 28, Smith writes about the Jerusalem
issue as follows: “Kahl was helping out in the drafting of parts of the 2012
Democratic Party platform, [he] and Congressman Robert Wexler were responsible
for altering the platform so that it omitted mention of Jerusalem
as the capital of Israel .”
People who attended the writing of a party platform at one
time or another would not be surprised by any of that because this is how
things proceed normally. The surprise comes with what Smith has written next.
He says this: “As one source told [Standard contributor Josh] Rogin at the time:
'Colin Kahl and Bob Wexler … led a secretive, exclusionary process, rather than
an inclusive one, and then attempted to cover their tracks by misleading
stakeholder about what they had done and with whom they had consulted.'”
And this is where the Jewish rape of the readers – and
through them the rape of the entire nation – explodes on the computer screen
like heavy duty pornography presented in full color. The fact is that a party
platform is written or altered when an idea comes to one person or maybe two.
The idea is then taken to the floor of the Party Convention where it is voted
on up or down. There is no room for something to be done secretively, no room
for an exclusionary process; and there is no reason to cover tracks that do not
exist. As to the stakeholders in the Smith story, they were the people at the Democratic
Convention which he did not mention for a reason.
The reason is that he not only raped his readers through the
quackery that is cited above, he raped them a second time by not mentioning the
Democratic Party Convention where the Jewish mass rape of America happened in
full view of America and full view of the world. The attendees were the
stakeholders before whom the alteration of the platform was put on the table,
and they voted on it. The vote by acclamation came in favor of accepting the
omission of Jerusalem .
And this is where a woman, no less, participated in the mass
rape of the convention attendees in full view of a worldwide audience. She did
it by whispering something in the ear of the male MC. He reluctantly asked the
attendees to shout their yeas and nays again whereupon the vote came even more
in favor of the omission. He looked at the woman and looked at the audience in
dismay, and asked the latter to shout their vote one more time. The result was
again in favor of the omission.
So now, guess what the MC did. He said that in his opinion
the omission had been turned down by the attendees. Upon that, the boos and
hisses rose from the convention floor … anger in the face of this flagrant
display of a mass rape inflicted upon both the convention attendees and the
American public – all done on television for the world to judge the quality of
American Democracy under Jewish autocracy. In fact, it looked like the public
ejaculation of Jewish moral syphilis into the head, heart and soul of the
nation.
What does Smith do after that? Despite all that ejaculation,
he still has the strength to do a bit of Jewish style intellectual
masturbation. Here it is: “It's hardly surprising that foreign policy experts
are scratching their heads with Kahl's appointment,” he says. He goes on to
quote what he calls a senior official at a pro-Israel organization who said:
“Colin Kahl left the administration under a cloud of failure … He tried to insert
an anti-Israel plank into the Democratic Party's platform and failed to the
point where the president had personally intervened to repair the damage.”
No. Nobody tried to insert anything in the Party's platform,
let alone insert an anti-Israel something. In fact, the attempt was to omit a
plank from the platform, not add to it.
But the way that the pro-Israel official portrayed what
happened goes to the nature of the Jewish moral syphilis that is being
ejaculated into America
day in and day out. It is this: If you do not express your absolute, undivided
and eternal love for Israel
and the Jews, you are anti-Israel and anti-Semitic.