Thursday, September 25, 2014

The Chess Game Obama has not mastered

In the same way that beggars are not choosers, evil is not finicky. It commits the wicked deeds it knows will pay off in the end, and waits for the unintended consequences to mature into a full fledged horror story before cashing in on it. The wickedness that evil commits can take the form of throwing sand in the gears of society's machinery, or it can be the throwing of a monkey wrench into its civic workings. It can also be the planting of booby traps or poison pills into its everyday operations.

One example of that is the address given in good faith by the well meaning American President Barack Obama to the General Assembly of the United Nations on September 24, 2014. He spoke to humanity in the name of humanity, but did so not knowing that the speechwriters who helped him write the speech, planted in it the poison pills, the booby traps, the sands and the monkey wrenches that made it a potential time bomb.

The most telling example is the deadliest of poison pills which is hidden in the following passage: “Leadership will be necessary to address the conflict between Palestinians and Israelis. The situation in Iraq, Syria and Libya should cure anyone of the illusion that this conflict is the main source of problems in the region; for far too long, it has been used in part as a way to distract people from problems at home.”

Let's begin with Libya. It is one of four North African countries – Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt and Libya – that had their moment with destiny. That is, the time had come for them to go through the difficulties of rebirth as it happened to most countries in Europe, Asia, Latin America and even the United States of America. Two of those four, Tunisia and Egypt were not interfered with, and made it past the transition period with less violence than any other jurisdiction; especially when compared to the American civil war – the most savage of them all.

Looking at Algeria, it is a country that had a more difficult time with its transition perhaps because of historical reasons, but also because there was an attempt to interfere with it from the outside. France was the culprit, and the Algerian side that the French stood against told France loudly and clearly that if it did not end its interference, they will do to France what France is doing to Algeria. France ignored them, and they launched a bombing campaign on French soil. Things settled down eventually.

As to Libya, the outside interference was so massive, the country descended into chaos. The link between the outside interference and the current state of chaos being unmistakable, it prompts the question: How did that interference come about, and why? The answer is that it was the work of Jews because this is how evil operates, and has operated since the dawn of recorded history. This time the Jews agitated in France and the United States with the ultimate aim of helping Israel dominate the region. Their dupes have been mostly the American suckers who paid for attacking Libya, and got blamed for the catastrophic failure that resulted.

We now come to the Levant. The mess in which this region finds itself at this time began when an American Jew stole satellite photos about Iraq's civilian nuclear power station and gave them to Israel. Using American weapons, Israel bombed the Iraqi civilian station; an act that set off the chain of events (all unintended consequences) that led to the chaos plaguing the region today. There too, evil began to work with the intent of making Israel the dominant power in the region but the unintended consequences took over, and the result turned out to be something else altogether.

This firmly establishes that Israel itself – and not only its conflict with the Palestinians – is the cause of the horrors that the Middle East has witnessed during the past few decades, and continues to suffer to this day. But why did the Jewish propaganda machine come up with the notion that “for far too long, it [the conflict] has been used in part as a way to distract people from problems at home”? And why did the speechwriters insert that canard in Obama's speech?

The reason is that the Jews play a kind of social chess game with those they intend to exploit. Having more than three thousand years of experience playing it, they have become so good at it, they think as much as ten moves ahead of their victims. Thus, when they get an American President to assert that the Arab leaders distract their people from problems at home – never mind that those leaders don't even admit there are problems at home – the Jews pocket the presidential utterance and sit on it for months or even years.

They wait, knowing that the day will come when they will slap the President's face with it should he dare telling Netanyahu that the Arabs are being reasonable and that he is not being helpful to the peace process.

Bingo! The Jews now have one more way with which to veto the part of the American foreign policy they don't like … and it all happened because the President handed it to them on a silver platter.