Every race, every ethnic group and every religious group that
moved into a new environment were resented by the locals at first, but then accepted as an integral part of the societal fabric, and treated as such.
Despite the fact that officially, America was created to be a
refuge for those fleeing discrimination, groups such as the Irish, the
Italians, the Poles, the Chinese, the Pakis, the Sikhs and the Muslims were
discriminated against by the populations that existed at the time.
What happened then was that the normal human interaction took its
course, and all these people got integrated into the American family. But this
did not happen to one group of people that called themselves by many
contradictory names depending on what suited their purpose at any given time.
And so, as you could then, you can still catch them call themselves
simultaneously: Semitic and Caucasian, white-skinned and brown-skinned, Middle
Eastern and European, Jewish and Judeo-Christian … or simply Jews for short.
At first, the Jews were resented in America, and then accepted
like everyone else. But shortly after that, the American people turned against
the Jews again not because of their origin or color of their skin or their
roots or religion. Americans, like the rest of the world, turned against the
Jews because of what the latter have been doing in America and Palestine. The
reason for the resentment is easy to understand as you'll see.
It is that individuals have a voice with which to express their
thoughts, thus can accomplish the things which are dear to them. A group of
people, considering themselves kinfolks on account that they share a common
ethnic origin or a religion, can have a collective voice to speak for them. To
that end, they create a common voice by launching a newspaper or an electronic
sight that speaks for the collective. In America, most groups have one or two
such outlets mostly used for the dissemination of social news about the group.
This is true for all the diaspora groups wherever they come from
and wherever they live, except for the Jews. No matter where the Jews come from
and no matter where they live, you'll find that the publications they put out
exceed in number all the other publications put together. You'll also find that
most of the content in these publications is opinion based, telling how good
Jews are and how bad everyone else is.
The Jews incessantly complain about everything big and everything
small, and tell everybody what to do to rectify the situation. But given that
the number of words in a language is finite, you'll find them echo the same
words ad nauseum. Readers and listeners to their message find this Jewish habit
a grotesque abuse of the language. They are neither impressed nor amused, and
in most cases feel annoyed by it.
The Jews do not attribute such human reaction to their behavior.
On the contrary, they see it as a defect in a human race that is predisposed to
turn antisemitic on a dime. This leads to a chain of reactions and
counter-reactions between the Jews and society, events that always end badly
for the Jews.
You can get a sense of how things develop and go from bad to worse
by reading an article in which the writer accuses everyone of being a terrorist
determined to terrorize the Jews. The article came under the title: “Soros'
Anti-Israel Funding,” was written by Rachel Ehrenfeld, and published on March
22, 2020 in The American Thinker. Here is a condensed version of that article:
“George Soros compares Israel's self-defense to Nazi atrocities.
Defense against terrorism, is never appropriate in Soros' book. After the war,
Jews resorted to terrorism against the British, Soros writes. Eventually Israel
suffered terrorist attacks. OSF funds organizations affiliated with terrorists,
especially the PFLP, a terrorist organization. The Israeli government reports
that Terrorists in Suits, show the tie between NGOs and terror organizations.
The oldest terror organization controls the US Domestic Terror Affiliate. An
OSF terrorist-linked NGOs include the Center for Human Rights. OSF has close
ties to the PFLP, Hamas and Islamic Jihad – all terrorist groups. OSF
supporting terrorists, shows that it and other Soros foundations pass funds to
terror-affiliated groups, and violate the laws banning support of terrorists.
BDS groups with links to the PFLP violate US laws banning support of
terrorists. Because of the veneer of human rights, environmentalism, and other
causes, NGO support of terrorists is pernicious”.
This article is one of the best examples to show that in the way
the Jews have diluted the value of the word “Holocaust” by accusing everyone
that did well articulating the Palestinian causes, of being a Holocaust denier,
the Jews have also diluted the value of the word “terrorist” by accusing
everyone that refuses to be deterred by Israel's show of force, of being a
terrorist.