Thursday, March 19, 2020

He stitched small Events into a big fake Story

Throughout history, countries around the world, have experienced financial trouble and have recovered. Like then, countries around the world, are today experiencing financial trouble and are recovering. One of these countries is Lebanon, which is going through financial difficulties at this time, but will recover as it did through several cycles in the past.

There are many reasons why a country might go through a period of financial trouble. To suggest––by indirect inference or otherwise––that it happens to all of them as a result of one and the same reason, is to show an appalling level of ignorance and delusion. And guess what, my friend, it took none other than Clifford D. May to make such inference, not realizing that such is the implication of what he is saying.

He did so in an article he wrote under the title: “Iran's Hezbollah virus infects Lebanon while attacking the world,” and the subtitle: “More debilitating than COVID-19 are the terrorists beholden to Iran's rulers.” May had the article published in The Washington Times on March 17, 2020.

Like it or not, the indirect inference that Clifford May is making, is that Hezbollah alone was responsible for the financial disruptions experienced by the various countries throughout history. But that is obviously an absurd proposition. It is absurd––if for no other reason––than Hezbollah has been around for only 40 years, and could not have developed the influence to affect anyone before that.

As to what happened after Hezbollah was formed at the start of the 1980s, it must be said that its financial clout amounted to only a fraction of Israel's clout that was combined to that of the World Jewry supporting it. Let us not forget that Hezbollah was formed in response to Israel's aggression against Lebanon, and has been busy ever since, struggling to get on its feet while at the same time defending Lebanon against a vicious enemy whose savagery knew no bounds. With all this on its plate, Hezbollah could not have been responsible for the financial disruption of Lebanon or any other country.

But how can someone like Clifford May be so confused about the situation in Lebanon and the surrounding region? Well, you'll get an inkling as to what the answer to that question may be when you take a close look at what Clifford May wrote in his article. Here is a pertinent passage: “Lebanon might not be in terrible shape today were it not infected by Hezbollah, agent of Iran ... Iran's rulers created Hezbollah”.

The truth is that in the early 1980s Iran was the friend of Israel and the enemy of the Arabs. Iran cheered every time that Israel attacked Lebanon or any Arab country. Rather than Iran creating Hezbollah as falsely claimed by Clifford May, it was Israel's aggression that did. Fed up by the failure of the Arab countries to protect Lebanon, the newly formed militia, now calling itself Hezbollah, turned to Iran for moral support and for the kind of material assistance that its fighters needed to defend against Israeli incursions into Lebanon, and to fight America's military occupation of the country.

Had Clifford May been faithful to history, he would have written a different article. But he didn't for a reason that is too obvious. In fact, that reason is detected in the second half of May's article where he spews his vitriol and reveals his paranoia with regard to the magnificent system of defense that Iran has assisted Hezbollah to build in Lebanon. As can be seen, the effect of that system has been the deterrence that’s keeping Israel at bay. It has helped enforce the state of peace at a border that used to be a feasting ground for a cannibalistic Israeli army equipped with deadly American weapons.

But the Jewish establishment, of which Clifford May is a member, knows that its reliance on America to protect and encourage Israel's savagery, is eroding. So then, what can someone like May do to bring to Israel the protective umbrella it needs to resume behaving savagely along the Lebanese border? Well, what May can do is look in the Judeo-Israeli playbook, and repeat what the Jews have been playing for centuries. It is a game that's played in two approaches simultaneously.

In one approach, you slander the opponent to make it sound like he is so evil, he deserves what he is about to get. Clifford May did that. In the other approach, you call on someone powerful to do the job for you by delivering to your opponent a punch so severe, he will not recover for a long time, if ever.

You’ll find that being unsure about continued American support, Clifford May addressed the international community. He slandered Iran and Hezbollah, but did not ask the world to fight for Israel. What he did instead, was use fear to scare the world about a Hezbollah whose interest is only the protection of Lebanon. And that is in contrast to the Jews who believe they own the world because God gave it to them, telling them to take it by hook, by crook or by the military of the suckers who will send their children to die for the Jews.