Let me begin by setting up a fictitious story that
will help me make my point. Here it is: Being a Semitic looking fellow of
Egyptian origin, I try to rent an apartment in the town where I lived for
several decades. The building manager, whom I reckon must be a closet
anti-Semite, takes one look at me and says that despite the sign which says
apartment for rent, there is no vacant apartment ready to be rented at this
time.
I complain to the Human Rights Commission, which
conducts an inquiry, sets-up a tribunal, tries the case and finds the building
manager guilty of discrimination. The tribunal rules in my favor, forces the
manager to pay me a fine as well as rent me an apartment in the said building.
Mistaking me for a Jew, the tribunal's presiding judge specifically asserts
that: Jews have rights, including the right to live where they choose. Opposing
that right or treating Jews differently would constitute discrimination.
I move into the apartment but shortly thereafter, I
take the printed judgment of the Human Rights Tribunal under my arm, take a gun
in my hand and go to a building that’s standing in the prettiest spot in town.
I go to the penthouse and confront the family that has lived there since the
building was put up. I order the family at gun point to get out because I am
moving in. When the family asks by what right do I make such a demand, I cite
the judgment of the tribunal which says: Jews have rights, including the right
to live where they choose. And so, having declared myself a Jew for the day, I
claim the right to live in that penthouse.
Now I ask you this question my friend: If I, or some
other entity that purports to be a Jew behaved in this manner, would you
consider me or that entity to be normal human beings? Or would you consider us
to be dangerously sick beasts that must not be allowed to roam the streets of
any place on Earth, but be locked up in a mental institution for life?
Once you have answered that question one way or the
other, go on and read the article that came under the title: “Defining 'Peace'
in the Middle East,” written by Steve Feldman who is executive director of the
Greater Philadelphia Chapter of the Zionist Organization of America. It was
published on March 10, 2020 in The American Thinker. As you read the article,
concentrate on the following passage:
“We can tell what they mean when they
assert what is preventing peace from breaking out … an official of a government
or a UN official or an NGO head, or some media pundit claiming that a Jewish
community somewhere prevents peace between Arabs and Israelis. How can that
possibly be? How can homes that Jews live in hamper peace? Don't Jews have
rights, including the right to live where they choose? Isn't opposing that
right discrimination? The UN Coordinator for Middle East Peace condemned plans
for Jewish homes. He issued an outrageous statement after Israel announced
plans to permit the construction of a few thousand living quarters”.
As you can see, being armed with a screwy kind of
Judeo-Zionist logic, Steve Feldman is not only defending Jews of every ethnic
background to invade an apartment, force its residents out at gun point and
occupy it, he is defending the military invasion of a whole country, and giving
it to strangers who say they are Jews. Feldman bases the appropriateness of his
claim on the Jewish right of return to a place that never was theirs while at
the same time seeking to forbid the Palestinian right of return to the place
that has been theirs since the beginning of time. How much screwier can a logic
be?
Steve Feldman isn't the only Jew using that kind of
rotting logic. In the same way that the argument about Jews having the right to
live anywhere, was used to grab someone's penthouse, you'll find that every
rule permitting one thing for a given occasion, is invoked by the Jews to do
the same thing where it does not apply. For a long time, no one was more
logically contorted than Alan Dershowitz, playing this game. But now that he's
getting old, a younger clone of him named Eugene Kantorovich is trying to fill
his shoes.
Yes, this is purely a Jewish problem and the Jews are
responsible for the consequences. But because it takes two to tango, their
partners in this demonic dance, must be held liable for the consequences of
their actions as well. The partners being the state and federal politicians who
listen to the screwing logic whispered in their ears, and respond to it as if
God had commanded them to act.
These characters go out of their way to give the Jews
and Israel what they ask for and then some while blocking every idea that might
advance the interests of the American people. To verify this assertion, look at
the record of Senator Ted Cruz, and be shocked at how many times he blocked or
threatened to block America’s business, and how many times he fast-tracked
Israel’s business. If that’s not a destructive Israeli mole in the American
Senate, what is?
The worst that is happening at this time is that the
Jews have their eyes on the system of education, which they want to own the
same way that they own the political whorehouses in the Washington Beltway.