It used to be said there are two certainties in life: death
and taxes; now we can add a third certainty. It is that in order to social
engineer the human race into a form that will work for them, the Jews will
mutilate not only history but everything else that might serve their purpose.
One thing on which the Jews and their surrogates are working
at this time is the Arab narrative. You can see what they are doing in this
realm by studying the latest of the Lee Smith creations. It has the title: “The
Iran-ISIS connection” and was published on June 12, 2015 in the Weekly
Standard.
The thing you need to know before you read the article is
that the Jews will try anything when testing the theories that their members
come up with in the field of social engineering. They also have a default
position on which to fall back when the experiment they are working on fails
completely or yields no workable result. That default position is to start
badmouthing the next target they have on the list of places in need of fixing.
Having had the Iranians as their closest ally in the Middle
East for several decades, the Jews did the customary badmouthing on them when
the two had a falling out with each other. After saturating the airwaves and
the print media with electronic nerve gas about the bad motives of the Iranians
– and seeing no tangible results – the Jewish propaganda machine changed its
tactic. Instead of simply attacking the Iranians, it has embarked on the
mutilation of the Arab narrative. It uses this method to make it sound like the
Arabs, and not the Jews, are the ones asking America to protect them from Iran.
Lee Smith has come to realize that to fashion an argument
that will stand, he must fabricate an Arab narrative that will connect the
start of that argument with the way it ends. Here is the start of the argument:
“the number of troops the president might send to Iraq is irrelevant until he
defines what would constitute victory over the Islamic State.” And here is the
way it ends: “To defeat the Islamic State, the Obama administration is going to
have to turn against Iran first.” So how does he get from here to there?
What he does is use the example of the Bush Iraq surge to
make the point that “the difficulty in defeating ISIS is more fundamentally
about policy.” He says that the surge succeeded because: “U.S. commanders
partnered with Sunni Arab tribes against Al Qaeda.” This being the case, he
goes on to explain that “the Sunni rebellion spearheaded by ISIS is the direct
fallout of the administration's Middle East policy. The president decided that
a deal with Iran is the be-all and end-all of his second term in office.” And
Smith concludes that “ISIS and its tribal enablers will continue to advance
unless the White House changes direction and turns against Iran, which the
Sunni tribes see as an even bigger threat than the foreign fighters of the
Islamic State.”
Having come to this point in building the foundation and in
constructing the early stages of a fake Arab narrative, Lee Smith takes the
step that causes the edifice to crumble under its own weight. This is how he
does it: “Left to fend for themselves, the Sunnis lined up with the remnants of
AQI as well as with the dead-enders from Saddam Hussein's military and
intelligence services who today constitute much of the Islamic State's
leadership.”
Astonishingly, he continues to call these people dead-enders
even though he says they formed the ISIS fighting force which he admits is
having great success in Iraq and in neighboring Syria. But who are these
people? They are the Baathists whom the Jews badmouthed to death before
ordering America to disband them in the effort to de-Baathify the Middle East
the way that the allies de-Nazified Germany after WW II.
Given these realities, against who would you say logic
dictates that the Baathists of Iraq and Syria are likely to rise-up against?
Could it be Christian America? Could it be Jewish America? No, says Lee Smith;
it's neither of these two. The Baathists chose to rise up “against Iran's
imperial ambitions in the Middle East,” he tells his readers. And this is how
the readers get to witness how a quack theory is shot down in flames by the
stupidity of its own creator.
Not realizing what he just did, Smith goes on to explain:
“By partnering with Iran, the White House has only ensured that ISIS will grow,
drawing strength from the wider Sunni population.”