It happens at times that we make a decision based on what we
know, and then regret it when the assumptions on which we based the decision
turn out to be different from what we thought. This happens to individuals, to groups
of people, even to nations. But if it happens that we decide on something that
looks iffy at the time, and our decision turns out to be correct in the long
run, the reward can be enormous in that we find ourselves to have been on the
right side of history.
And it happens at this point in time that the American
Congress is asked to make a decision with regard to the nuclear deal that the
Executive, together with five other nations, negotiated with Iran . It proved
at the end of the talks that the subject was so important to all of humanity,
every nation on Earth considered the negotiations to have been conducted on its
behalf. And when all was said and done, every nation that expressed itself on
the subject except for one, welcomed the deal.
That exception is Israel whose influence on the
American Congress makes people the world over smile with derision and contempt
at a legislative body whose priorities have turned it into an insult to the
notion of self-respect. And what makes Israel 's
influence so powerful in the Congress, is that it was created by the Jews who
also managed to take control of the means of communication in America ; a
situation that enables them to bribe or blackmail the office holders. The net
result is not only that when the Jew says jump the Congress asks how high … it
is that the legislators fight to climb on the shoulder of colleagues so as to
impress the Jew from how high they can jump when ordered to do so.
We can see a livid expression of this horrifyingly sordid
situation in the Wall Street Journal editorial that came under the title:
“Democrats and the Ayatollahs” which also has the subtitle: “Obama's party is
now accountable for Iranian behavior.” It was published on September 3, 2015.
In it, the editors lament: “Mikulski became the 34th Senate Democrat to
announce her support for President Obama's nuclear deal with Iran , enough to
sustain a veto on a resolution of disapproval.”
But why are these people so unhappy? They are because the
machinery they set up to exploit the deficiencies of the American parliamentary
system were blunted by an Executive that saw the superpower it presides over
degenerate into a super-joke faster than the blink of an eye. Unable to do
anything about the Executive's success, the editors warn: “The deal will
proceed, and Democrats are taking responsibility for Iran 's compliance and imperial
ambitions. They now own the Ayatollahs.” Try to tell that to the Ayatollahs.
What vexes the editors most is that the Executive turned the
table on the Judeo-Israeli lobby that's in charge of exploiting the weaknesses
of the American democracy. What the lobby has been doing for decades is work
out amendments that favor their causes, and have them ride on bills which are
of importance to the nation. Because the Congress must pass the larger bill,
having deliberated on its merits exhaustively, it votes into law the
pro-Jewish, pro-Israeli filth that comes riding with it … without a word being
said about it.
And while no one, aside from Ronald Reagan who asked for the
right to line-item veto, dared to speak against that near-to-criminal practice,
the editors of the Wall Street Journal now shamelessly moan: “What a spectacle
that would be – the President using a procedural dodge to avoid voting on the
merits of so consequential a deal.”
To reinforce their arguments, the editors of the Journal
fall back on the Jewish routine of badmouthing those who are not here to defend
themselves. Thus, they demonize the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei; the
head of the Assembly of Experts, Mohammad Yazdi; and the head of the Quds
Force, Qasem Soleimani – all of whom reacted at one time or another – to the
Jewish non-stop crescendo out of America to the effect that Iran must be
sanctioned, sanctioned and sanctioned even more … it must be bombed, bombed and
bombed even more.
And yet, all that the Iranians said were things like this:
“our policy toward the arrogant U.S.
will not change.” And like this: “We should not change our foreign policy of
opposition to America .”
Despite all that, the editors end their dissertation with this piece of wisdom:
“The Iran
deal is one of those moments when history will remember where politicians
stood.”