Saturday, May 9, 2020

Artificial Love begets natural Hatred

The world is coming close to cementing the view that the Zionist movement is nothing more than the aspiration of a centuries-old organized crime syndicate.

To free yourself of old prejudices and misconceptions about Jews and the Zionist movement, you need to reject off-hand the argument that says Jews ought to be loved as a group because of who they are. It is imperative to do such rejection because if you hold the view that Jews can be loved as a group, you imply that they can also be hated as a group, and not regarded as individuals, each to be judged according to his or her character.

It flows from this point of view that he who says he loves Jews as a group just because they are Jews and nothing else, implicitly asserts that anti-Semitism is a natural sentiment that must be preserved and never questioned.

Jonathan S. Tobin that has demonstrated time after time he loves to wallow in the warm and velvety feeling of being hated, has written a piece through which he advocates that Jews be loved regardless of the person's character. He thus helps to perpetuate the hatred of Jews, as well as serves himself with the warm and velvety feeling of being hated, something he can no longer live without.

Tobin wrote: “Is there something wrong with people liking Jews?” an article that also came under the subtitle: “Some denounced Trump's envoy on anti-Semitism when he called for philo-Semitism. Are they right to consider those who admire Jews as dangerous?” The article was published on May 7, 2020 in the online publication, Jewish News Syndicate.

What prompted Tobin to write this article is that the State Department held a press call during which its spokesman promised to combat anti-Semitism by promoting philo-Semitism, which means by advocating the love of Jews as a group regardless of the individuals' character. And so, after going through a rambling elaboration of the subject, Tobin concluded what was expected he would conclude: advocating the love of Jews is a good thing to do, regardless of the consequences.

To understand why philo-Semitism leads to anti-Semitism, we need to know where the idea came from in the first place. Well, it all began when the Hebrew nomadic tribes that were roaming the deserts of the Middle East and North Africa, decided they wanted to be respected the same as the citizens of the magnificent empires of the time, such as Egypt, Persia, Assyria, Babylon and so on.

But because the Hebrews did not have an empire of their own to associate with and display their pride, they invented the idea of a God that's greater than the rulers of the existing empires combined, choosing them to be his favorite children for no reason but that they are who they are. And since an inquisitor that wants to verify the assertion cannot do so without talking to God, no one has contradicted the Jewish claim because no one was able to get in touch with God. And so, the idea has remained cast in stone like this: The Hebrews are the chosen children of a powerful God who will protect them against those that hate them and wish to harm them.

The Hebrews made that construct the cornerstone of their system of beliefs, and migrated in droves from the Middle East and North Africa to Europe. Given that they looked physically different from the Europeans and were discriminated against for it, their priority was to make themselves look like the Europeans without being assimilated. The way they did this, was to shed their Hebrew identity, which was the source of their problem, but stick with their Jewish identity, which they bestowed on the locals who converted to Judaism.

Now calling themselves Jews rather that Hebrews, they found that the easiest group of locals to convert to Judaism were the street children whom they kidnapped or lured into the walled ghettos they built for themselves. They raised the children, shielded from outside interference, and went on to indoctrinate them with the precepts of their system of beliefs. When the children were old enough to procreate, they crossbred with them, producing “Jewish” offspring who increasingly––generation after generation––came to look more like Europeans than Middle Easterners. And so, they started calling themselves European Jews.

Confident that they can now go toe to toe with the local Christians competing against them in every field of endeavor, the Jews tried to strengthen the advantage they had by reviving the old idea of being chosen by God to be his favorite children, therefore entitled to be loved without question. However, rather that love them, the locals began to resent them. Instead of backing off, the Jews doubled down on their claim, buoyed by the fact that the Arab Civilization was now ascending. The Jews associated themselves with the Arabs on account that they were their Semitic cousins. And this is how the resentment of Jews became the hatred of all Semites.

During the subsequent centuries, the Arabs conquered a good part of Europe but were eventually pushed back. The anti-Semitic sentiment that was reserved for the Arabs began to erase, but remained alive for the Jews who maintained their way of life, and refused to assimilate while continuing to claim they were the chosen children of God, entitled to privileges no one else can have.

For all these reasons, the State Department forcing or coaxing people to love Jews, will have the same boomerang effect it has had for thousands of years: Make the Jews hated like the plague. It may serve Jonathan Tobin and those like him, but not the rank-and-file or the rest of humanity.