The young of most species in the world's fauna, learn
by watching the adults (mostly the parents) do things. For example, birds learn
how to use their wings to fly from watching their parents leave the nest and
return to it. Monkeys learn where to forage and what to eat by watching members
of the troop do it. Human children learn by watching adults do things, but also
by asking how to do things and being told how.
This is not the only difference between children of
the human species and the other species of the fauna. Whereas the other species
learn and excel at doing only what is necessary to survive and perpetuate the
species, the human children do this much, but also learn to do the artificial
chores that separate the humans from the animals.
Most animals can be trained to perform some of the
artificial moves which are of the humans' purview. Most of the time such
training is done by circus personnel because human audiences find it amusing to
watch animals mimic them. On some occasions, pets have been observed to make
moves for which they were not trained but learned by watching their owners ...
such as opening a door or turning on a light.
Of all the species that imitate humans, the monkeys
come closest to us. But there is one important difference between them and us.
It is that past a certain age, the human child begins to realize that whereas
it is acceptable at times to make a certain move, it is not acceptable to make
the same move at other times because the consequences can be disastrous. The
monkey is not equipped to make this kind of realization.
For example, whereas a human being would turn on a
stove and place on it a pot to warm the food, a monkey might turn on the same
stove and place on it a can of gasoline. It is that, at a certain age, the
human child will on its own, begin to discern that switching one thing with
another can have dire consequences. By contrast, the monkey will never make
this realization on its own, or grasp the concept that's involved.
What is disheartening in all of this, is that wicked
human beings have learned to devise a subtle sort of switcheroo trick that
makes a can of gasoline look like a pot of food even to a fairly intelligent adult
human. And the wicked will play the game to the hilt, serving their interests
at the expense of everyone else. You can see how that works when you go over
the article that came under the title: “For Israel, Biden will prove worse than
Bernie,” written by Matthew Mainen and published on May 3, 2020 in The
Washington Examiner.
To begin with, the game of politics as it evolved in
America had already deteriorated to look like an exercise in horse-trading that
was beginning to compromise the principles upon which democracy was erected.
But it had not yet gone beyond trading one American interest for another
American interest. This was changed when a switcheroo trick was injected into
the game by the Jews who made America look like Israel, and made Israel look
like America. The following is the condensed passage in the Matthew Mainen
article that shows how this is done:
“It became clear that Joe Biden will win the
nomination. The Democrats may have opened the gates to someone more damaging to
Israel than Bernie. To Bernie, foreign policy was a distant priority to his
domestic agenda. Every alteration Bernie desired for his country would have
required compromising on other issues. For example, if Bernie attempted to
institute taxes on Wall Street while canceling student debt, pro-Israel
legislators could have conditioned their support on continued US aid to Israel.
On the other hand, Democrats will support Biden's domestic agenda, such that
his policies toward Israel will receive little internal pushback. Biden's
flawed approach to Israel will have a much greater likelihood of being
implemented”.
What is traded here is the welfare of the American
student population for “continued US aid to Israel,” which means the continued
support for Israel's occupation of Palestine, and the slow motion ethnic
cleansing of the land to make room for Jews from around the world who are paid
to go settle in Palestine under the protection of the Israeli army of
occupation.
This is an egregious example of the hundreds that the
Jewish propaganda machine has invented to make the Jewish case while the Arabs
were shut out of the debate. You'll find some of the less egregious ones in the
current Mainen example, but in addition to that, the propaganda machine has
developed a new concept that promises to be a doozy when it blossoms to its
fullest egregious extent. Here is how the author used it in his current
article:
“Aside from undermining Jewish self-determination,
which should be seen as disqualifying to anyone that is pro-Israel, Biden
adheres to the international consensus on resolving the Palestinian-Israeli
conflict”.
This is the new switcheroo model that's increasingly
used by the Jews. It consists of invoking a legal right such as the right to
live anywhere I want, and switching it to mean something else. Look how it
would work: Implicit in the above right is that, as a Canadian citizen, I have
the right to live anywhere in Canada without being discriminated against. What
I cannot do is invoke the right to try living in Ireland without permission,
however much that country fascinates me. And yet, this is the right that the
Jewish leaders tell their followers entitles them to kick Palestinians out of
their homes in Palestine, and make the properties their own.
In the current Mainen article, the switcheroo is done
in relation to the right of self-determination. Ordinarily, the law gives a
group of people that's colonized by a foreign power, the right to resist the
occupation and be free to continue the way of life it has been developing since
the beginning of time. The law does not give the colonists the right to
determine what they can do with someone else's property. And yet, this is what
the Jews want to do by invoking rights they never had.