In Christianity (at least in Catholicism) there is the
notion that we each have a guardian angel who stands by our side and saves us
from any physical mishap that may befall us before our time. He also counters
any evil influence the devil may try to inflict on us. It is like magic working
on our behalf without revealing itself.
The pagans of olden times had similar notions, one
being the “lucky charm” that gave the person carrying it magical powers to
extricate themselves from a dangerous situation. Now my friend, would you
believe me if I told you that something similar has developed in modern times?
It is called politics. It is like magic. If you're a politician, you can do
whatever you want, chalk it up to politics, and you'll get away with it any
time.
The trend started innocently and was meant to be an
exercise that gives the politicians leeway when it came to serving their
constituents under difficult circumstances. For example, if a district was in
need of a government funded project that would take too long to get approval
for, the politician representing the district would horse-trade with other
politicians and have his project fast-tracked in return for concessions he
makes to them. This also meant getting around the law in a small way at times …
but that's just the extent of deviant behavior that was allowed in the name of
political expediency.
In time, however, that habit mushroomed into a
full-blown politico-magical trick, and became a deadly pandemic used in the
so-called democracies, especially the one called America. In fact, America is
the place where a single federal senator, coming under the influence of a
foreign entity not worth a hill of beans, can block and often does a major
project that's vital to America. He calls his act a legitimate political
exercise, and gets away with it as if by the magic of a lucky charm he has in
his pocket.
By the same token, a herd of politicians––from a
single party or from a treasonous bipartisan alliance––can be persuaded to give
away the country's military, treasury and foreign policy apparatus to a foreign
entity not worth a hill of beans, and call their act a legitimate political
exercise. And all those who participate in such publicly drilled abomination,
get away with the horrors they commit, no matter how deadly they are. It’s all
politics, after all. It’s all magic.
And because everything that America does overseas gets
duplicated in America; and because everything that America does domestically,
it tends to duplicate it overseas; that kind of politics was used by America to
emasculate itself on the world stage time after time. For example, America did
it by starting a fight with the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the World
Trade Organization (WHO), not to mention the United Nations' agencies such as
the Human Rights Council and the United Nations Educational Scientific and
Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
America says it is staying out of the ICC because the
court is playing politics and wants to investigate (not convict, just
investigate) some American soldiers who were suspected of committing war crimes
in Afghanistan. That's how America uses the word “politics” like the magical
abracadabra that gets it out of embarrassing situations.
As to the story of the WHO, America says it might want
to get out of it because that organization refuses to convict China for the
COVID-19 pandemic before there has been an investigation. Why so? Because
China's guilt is obvious and there is no need for an investigation or a trial,
says America. What's this, I hear you ask? I'll tell you what it is. It is
Jewish style justice with which America has been imbued.
In fact, you can see an example of how the Jews defend
this kind of logic as they stick it to America for doing what its politicians
are taught to do by their Jewish masters. The article came under the title: “It
Is Time to Set Up a New Global Health Body to Replace the WHO,” written by Con
Coughlin, and published on May 21, 2020 in the Jewish publication The Gatestone
Institute. Here, in condensed form, is Coughlin argument:
“President Xi's offer to support an inquiry by the WHO
into the pandemic amounts to an attempt to avoid proper scrutiny about
Beijing's culpability for spreading COVID-19. No one should be taken in by Xi
Jinping's offer to cooperate with an inquiry into the origins of the
coronavirus pandemic. No one believes the organization has the credibility to
undertake an independent investigation. This is the view of the Trump
administration, which has responded by threatening to withdraw support from the
organization altogether. Mr. Tedros, the WHO chief, showed his colors with the
praise for China's response to the pandemic, where he complimented Beijing for
setting a new standard for outbreak response. With someone like Mr. Tedros at
the helm of the WHO, that body is not fit, and any attempt to reform it is
doomed to fail. A better solution is to set up a completely new international
health body”.