In the contest for the first prize as to which non-Jew
is more Jewish-like or more so than the most fanatic of Jews, two contestants
seem to have become the clear front-runners at this time. They are Donald J.
Trump and Nikki Haley.
Donald Trump's strategy consists of giving the Jews
what's not his, which comes down to what belongs to the Arabs and the Muslims,
90% of which being what belongs to the already dispossessed Palestinians. It
also consists of beating up on the Arabs and the Muslims who cannot defend
themselves, here too, 90% of which being the helpless Palestinians.
Donald Trump also gives the Jews what belongs to the
American people, something he finds easy to do because the federal and state
legislatures of the so-called democratic superpower, have turned the country
into a free-for-all, open-door bordello with no guard at the door and no
landlord to ask questions. Sitting at the highest point on the roof, Donald
Trump watches the Jews freeload everything precious and everything cheap, and
asks himself: When are they going to stop for a moment and adulate me?
As to Nikki Haley, she was caught in the dragnet that
was devised by the Jewish leaders; the one that was meant to catch the various
ethnic groups in America, one group at a time ... and tell them specifically
concocted stories that would appeal to them. Haley being of Sikh descent but
plagued with a skull as void as an Ethiopian corcorro, they found her as
malleable as putty in the hands of a playful child. They taught her that the
world was divided into good people, all lovers of Israel––and bad people, all
haters of Israel. And she fanatically came to believe this description of the
world.
From that moment on, Nikki Haley has been doing
nothing but absorb the Jewish talking points and spewing them wherever she
finds herself. And so, it happens that a day or two ago, she found herself in
front of a computer monitor and keyboard, ready to compose an article, telling
the world it is divided into good people and bad ones –– with Winston Churchill
being good and the Chinese being bad. To make sure that the readers will react
the way they are supposed to, she included the ingredient that the Jews told
her was indispensable in such conversation: fear. She made her readers fear
China.
And Nikki Haley found no better way to accomplish that
task but to quote Winston Churchill at the start of the article she wrote under
the title: “China's coronavirus actions are just one of many threats it poses,”
published on April 29, 2020 in The Washington Post. Here is what she quoted
Churchill as saying: “I tell you it is no use arguing with a Communist. It's no
good trying to convert a Communist or persuade him … The only thing to do is to
convince them that you have superior force … and that is the greatest chance of
peace, he surest road to peace”.
Being no smarter than Winston Churchill, Nikki Haley
failed to see the absurdity of that statement. The fact that Churchill said you
cannot convert the Communists, and in the next breath said, you convince them
that you have superior force, did not ring the bell of contradiction inside her
corcorro head. So now that the contradiction was brought to your attention,
what is it Nikki Haley? Can you convert/convince the Communists or can you not?
As to you, my friend, sit back and watch her try to tiptoe, not through the
tulips, but through the Judeo-Churchillian load of absurdities.
Here she is. Look how she starts the long paragraph, which
comes near the end of the article: “Why was China different? Go back to
Churchill's explanation.” Hailey goes on to list all the lies, the half-truths
and the alternative truths that were leveled against China by anyone at any
time. So, you get your literary magnifying glass and go through her rant to see
how it relates to what Churchill has said, and find not a hint of relation.
So then, what is it that she's talking about? From
where did she get those ideas? Look at a sample of them, and you'll know:
“Everything its leaders do is aimed at expanding the party's power. It is why
they cannot tolerate freedom in Hong Kong. Why they insist on taking over
Taiwan. Why they seek to dominate countries and international organizations.
Why they expand their arsenal”.
If that makes no sense to you my friend, apply what
she said to the Middle East, and it will suddenly make sense. Here it is:
“Everything the Likud leaders do is aimed at expanding the party's power. It is
why they cannot tolerate freedom in the West Bank. Why they insist on taking
over all of Palestine. Why they seek to dominate America and international
organizations. Why they expand their arsenal.” That's what it was. Nikki Haley
was thinking Israel and accusing China instead.
Look now how Nikki Haley ends that same paragraph:
“China is a dangerously different power because it is steadfastly committed to
an ideology that views its system as superior and seeks its advancement in
every way.” Does it not remind you of the Jewish “Tikkum Olam?”
Maybe it is true what Churchill has said after all,
except that he applied it in the wrong place at the wrong time. Maybe he should
have said the following about our time:
I tell you it is no use arguing with specimen who were
brainwashed to love the Jews. It's no good trying to convert them or persuade
them … The only thing to do is to convince them that you have a superior
argument ... and that is the greatest chance of quiet, the surest road to end
their rant”.