From
the behavior of the Israelis and their Jewish American cohorts, it looks like
these people feel they are approaching crunch time as far as the Palestinian
question is concerned.
But
despite the pressure, the Jews seem morbidly incapable of escaping the decaying
orbit in which they placed themselves decades ago, if not centuries ago. They
had the opportunity to escape that orbit in 1967, but instead of making the
most out of the opportunity, they tried to use it to anchor themselves more
solidly in the decaying orbit that has led them nowhere for God knows how long.
The
Israelis and America's Jews still have the opportunity to escape their fate but
the window is closing on them, and they know it. The problem is that they
haven't a clue how to slip away from the sickly doctrine that forces them to
choose the wrong path from among the many good ones available to them. Instead,
they keep tripping themselves with stubborn audacity time after time.
One
of those who should know better is Clifford D. May. Unfortunately, he has shown
his handicap yet again, with the haggling article of uselessness he wrote under
the title: “Israel's daunting decision on drawing permanent borders,” and the
subtitle: “Calculating the benefits and risks of extending sovereignty to parts
of the West Bank.” It was published on May 19, 2020 in The Washington Times.
Going
over it, you'll read about people who constantly run around the legislatures of
the American states asking them to pass laws that will criminalize and jail
Americans who see parallels between the behavior of today's Israel and
historical events. Clifford May will not tell you this, but he'll moan about
Arab kids who grew up under Jewish occupation, venting their frustration by
uttering words that the Jews say were similar to those uttered by the Nazis
decades ago. That is, if an American scholar says that Israel annexing
neighboring lands is the same as Hitler annexing neighboring land, the Jews
will want him sent to jail. If an Arab kid that's brutalized by the occupation
says he wants to be free, the Jews will want him shot dead and his internal
organs harvested. Here is an example of that, courtesy of Clifford May:
“'From
the river to the sea, Palestine shall be free!' You've doubtless heard that
chant. But what does free mean? What the chanters must have in mind is that
Israel should be free of Jewish Israelis. The Germans, not quite a century ago,
had words for that: Judenfrei, Jew-free, and Judenrein, which implies cleansed
of Jews. In other words, the chant you've been hearing is a call for ethnic and
religious cleansing”.
This
is how the cannibalistic retards of America reacted when they heard Dr. Martin
Luther King utter the words: Free at last. Free at last. Thank God Almighty I'm
Free at Last. It is how the cannibalistic retards of apartheid South Africa
reacted when they heard that Nelson Mandela spoke of freeing his people. It is
how the cannibalistic retards of Zion react when they hear the Palestinians
clamor for freedom wherever they live in the homeland that has been theirs
since the beginning of time, and will be theirs to the end of time.
The
Jews still have the chance to put misery behind them and join the human race
because humanity has given them two new opportunities. One opportunity is the
five decades old UN resolutions 242 and 338. The other opportunity is the two
decades old Arab initiative. Both resolutions allow the Jews to expand Israel
from the 1948 borders which it is legally entitled to, up to the 1967 borders
which it is not now entitled to. But the Jews have always wanted more than
that, and they conned the Americans into backing them. As to the Arabs, they
knew better, and never let the Jews con them.
In
fact, with the 1967 Pearl Harbor style sneak attack on its neighbors, Israel
had expanded its territory to something like 4 times what it is today. The Jews
told the Arabs let's negotiate, but knowing that negotiating with the Jews is
like being invited to a dinner of live mice and dead birds by a family of
snakes in their pit, the Arabs said there will be no negotiation because what
was taken by force will only be returned by force.
In
1973, the Arabs counter attacked and took back most of what the Jews had stolen
in 1967. What is left in the hands of the Jews is a thin sliver of Syria's
Golan Height, and Palestine's West Bank of the Jordan River. Both the Syrians
and the Palestinians have seen that nothing was returned in more than 50 years
of negotiations, and they reckon that it is because sufficient force has not
been applied. How this standoff will end is anybody's guess.
Meanwhile,
Clifford May that created the comical outfit called Foundation for Defense of
Democracies, did not disappoint when it came to showing the funny side of his
creation. To explain why it is okay to steal from the Palestinians, he chose to
write this part of the work in the style of a Laurel and Hardy script. Here is
how it would go if it will be fully developed:
WORLD: You say Kontorovich
says Palestine is not in the UN because it is out.
MAY: Yes, Kontorovich says
Palestine is out because it is not in.
WORLD: But he is not a
lawyer in the UN because he is out.
MAY: Yes, he is out of the
UN because he is not in.
WORLD: So, how does
Kontorovich know that Palestine is not in because it is out?
MAY: Kontorovich knows
because when he is not in, he is out … and when he is not out, he is in.
WORLD: But how can he not be
in or out at the same time, when he is not out and not in at the same time?
MAY: He knows because he
cannot be out or in at the same time when he's in or out at different times.
WORLD: You're confusing me,
Clifford May.