Do you want proof that the self-appointed leaders of
the Jews as well as the entire Jewish establishment, love to bask in the
velvety feeling of being hated? If you don't know what this is about and wish
to be given a hint, read the article that came under the title: “Jews
threatened by rampant coronavirus-fueled anti-Semitism,” written by Beth Bailey
and published on May 15, 2020 in the Washington Examiner.
Beth Bailey wrote about the relationship between the
coronavirus pandemic and antisemitism previously. Apparently, however, it seems
that she “ain't got no satisfaction” from the experience and so, she went back
to the well looking for a sweeter deal that would quench her thirst for the velvety
feeling of being hated. And she seems to have found what she was looking for.
Here is how that went:
“The most explosive incident came from an
elected official. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio tweeted to the Jewish
community that the time for warnings has passed. His remark drew swift
condemnation from Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt, numerous
Jewish groups, politicians, and media commentators. As Greenblatt explained,
comments like the mayor's contribute to the overall environment where Jews are
seen as different...”
And then, to close her thinking on this
matter, she added the following: “...In the days after de Blasio's tweet, Jews
continued to be targeted”.
Did you see what happened here, my friend? Let me
explain. Self-centered, narcissistic individuals often forget that when they
talk to someone, they are not talking to themselves, and so they tell others
what they would tell themselves. And this happens to be the best way that an
observer can build genuine insight as to what the self-centered individual is
thinking. One such glaring example happened not long ago when President Donald
Trump –– that has been telling himself it is better not to have tests done on
the public because they might reveal that the pandemic is worse than estimated
–– said it publicly, not realizing he was betraying his most secret thoughts.
Lucky us, observers!
And that's what Beth Bailey did when she pointed out
that Jews continued to be targeted after de Blasio's tweet the same as before
the tweet. What this says is that she and the Jewish establishment that's
behind her, feared there will be a reduction in the number of Jews being
harassed after the tweet, which would prove that the public had welcomed de
Blasio's tweet, and thought that it was good enough to send the right message
to the Jews. In effect then, Beth Bailey and Jews like her were rooting for the
harassment of Jews to continue. And that's why it is not an exaggeration to say
that Jews love to bask in the velvety feeling of being hated. Come to think of
it, there has been a reduction in the number of Jews being harassed, which is
probably why Bailey is lashing out as if to compensate.
Are there additional clues in Beth Bailey's article
that would corroborate this theory? Yes, there are as can be seen in the
following condensed passage:
“When I first wrote of anti-Semitism, the
nation had witnessed acts of anti-Semitic harassment. Since then, such acts
have continued and perhaps even escalated. In response to an event, de Blasio
told reporters, 'We don't accept bias in New York City. We don't accept hate in
any form.' Unfortunately, his words manifested both, and their effects have yet
to be seen. At a time when acts of anti-Semitism seem ubiquitous, people may
feel incapable of making a difference. In such conditions, anti-Semitic hate
will continue to thrive. There are myriad ways for individuals to fight
anti-Semitism, including reporting incidents to the ADL, which can harness the
resources to advocate for change. If a handful can make headlines by spraying
graffiti and waving hateful signs, imagine the power of millions raising our
voices in condemnation of anti-Jewish prejudice”.
When she says that such acts may have
“even escalated,” she is not reporting an observation, she is expressing a
wish. When she says that the effects of de Blasio's words, “have yet to be
seen,” she reveals that she can't wait to see something big and ugly happen;
something that will yield highly profitable dividends. She goes on to tell her
Jewish readers that acts of anti-Semitism are so ubiquitous, they should feel
incapable of doing something about it. For this reason, they must report all
that they see (the more the better) to the ADL that will demand, and will
succeed in getting more money for the Jewish organizations, as well as see to
it that more laws are imposed on society, and more privileges granted to the
Jews. Finally, she does not hide the fact that she fantasizes about millions of
people expressing in unison their philo-Semitic eternal love for the Jews.
What is remarkable about Beth Bailey's piece is that
it brings in the open much of what the Jewish pundits have been expressing in
subtle ways. This is why, unlike most other pieces, it is easy to determine
from her piece that the Jews have always been the architects of their misery,
and that they apparently intend to so remain forever.
That is obviously a trade-off the Jews are making
willingly. They will live with the misery if they must, doing so in exchange
for the privileges they relish. Of course, they would love to have it both
ways: the love of Jews and the compensation for being hated, but they haven’t
yet found a method by which to package this contradiction in a way that will
fool the Beltway's braindead zombies.
Until they find a way, the Jews will keep pushing
their luck despite a rising tide of anti-Semitism in America that's
increasingly looking like the one that rose in Europe a century ago.