It is normal in the battle
between good and evil that the public (which each side tries to win over) will,
for a while, be confused as to which is the good side, and which is the evil
one. This happens because each side will claim to be good while portraying the
other as being evil. And while the battle rages between the two sides, members
of the general public will do what comes naturally to human beings, and that is
to try and pick the good side by determining instinctively which would make a
better friend.
But as the battle gets to be played at a more sophisticated
level, the two players will eventually catch on to the method used by the
public to make a decision. And in response, the players will incorporate into
the portrayal of the self, the sense that they would make the better friend.
And, of course, this will complicate the choice making process of the public as
it tries to pick one friend from among the two rivals.
This is a social game that has been playing out since the
beginning of time in the daily lives of individuals wherever they were on this
planet, and whatever may have been their social status. As to those who must
decide who to befriend and who to avoid – without making mistakes and having to
learn from them – the task has been a complicated one because the factors
entering into the equation are numerous, and the possibilities prohibitive.
Just imagine that in the lottery game where the choices we must make are 6 from
among 49, the permutation of possible results rises to 14 million. In fact, in
all such cases, to make a choice by using some kind of logic, almost always
ends in failure. Only the instinct has a chance at making the correct choice.
And when the game is played at the higher level of politics
– and played among cultures which are defined by the stereotypical traits
associated with religion and/or ethnicity, the correct choice becomes literally
impossible to make. Even an instinct that is honed by years of experience
cannot be certain which group will make the better friend, and which will not.
But something unexpected can come out of the blue, and help in this respect. It
can happen that someone rises from one of the groups and shows the world why
his/her group cannot be trusted therefore can never be a friend, let alone a
good friend.
This is what Lee Smith, the big honcho at the Jewish Tablet
Magazine, has done with an article titled: “America Is the Arsonist of the
Middle East,” and subtitled: “John Kerry's failed peace negotiations set off
the spiral of violence between Israel
and the Palestinians.” It was published in the Tablet Magazine on July 8, 2014
and reprinted on the same day in the Weekly Standard … of which he is senior
editor. You may consider this article to be the definitive word with regard to
what Jewish friendship boils down to in the final analysis.
Considering that America has been (1) instrumental in the
establishment of the State of Israel; (2) indispensable to maintaining it as a
viable concern and (3) has done all this for no reason except for what is
called the friendship which binds the two peoples together, how strong do you
expect the bond to be between the Jews and the Americans? Well, we already
encountered the title of the article written by Lee Smith the Jew. It reads:
“America Is the Arsonist of the Middle East ”.
Some thank you, that is! Some friendship it reflects!
In fact, this is the definitive word as to the worth of the
friendship that a Jew can extend to someone. It is clear that by religious temperament,
the Jews are incapable of forging an honest friendship with a non-Jew, or even
maintaining a fake one for too long before exposing themselves. Those among them,
who discover they can forge a true friendship, and do become friends with
someone, end up changing identity because they realize they can no longer call
themselves Jews.
And in the same way that the collective “Jews” have been
fooling America into believing they want a peace agreement with the
Palestinians when in reality they never wanted one but played the game to milk
America as it tried to mediate between the two – those same Jews are now paving
the way to play the same game with regard to America's relationship with Iran.
But in reality, the Jews will never have a cordial relation
with the Iranians. They will make the Americans believe they can forge one to
get the superpower embroiled in another war, milk it and then spit it out when
there will be nothing left to milk.