When someone
presents himself or herself as a volunteer adviser in a project they say they
know more about than anyone else, they are expected to have a plan; be able to
explain it entirely and be convincing enough that if not accepted in its
entirety, parts of it may be used in conjunction with other plans. This is how
things happen normally in advanced societies where things have proven to work
fairly well most of the time.
Sometimes, things
can become more “vibrant” than that, and still remain within the parameters of
what is considered civilized enough to be labeled advanced. Sadly, however, it
is a rare occasion when the situation turns out to be what it seems. More often
than not, the volunteer adviser would have a hidden agenda he works
energetically to promote, thus confuses the observer. He manages to make even
the most seasoned observer believe that the energy she sees is genuine, and
that it is produced by the enthusiasm of the fake volunteer. Sometimes the fake
adviser is unmasked and pushed out; sometimes he is not.
It can happen that a
situation may develop over decades in a setting that is referred to as
democratic where many plans or parts of them would have been tried and proven
to fail to one degree or another. And the odd thing is that sometimes a
government likes to appear being so open as to take into consideration points
of view advanced by pundits that have repeatedly proven to be wrong. Such
government soon finds itself run like an asylum that was taken over by the
inmates.
This is where America has
been. It has – not only with regard to the single issue of the Middle East
where the inmates promoted their oddities and made them stick – but with regard
to America 's
dealings with the whole world where the inmates caused their oddities to
metastasize and take roots. Buoyed by their early successes, the Jewish pundits
who chased everyone that opposed them off the marketplace of ideas with the
accusation of being antisemitic, managed to have their cohorts infiltrate and
occupy every nook and cranny of the American decision making apparatus.
But once there in
droves and in control of everything, the Jewish leaders of the operation found
themselves lacking the most important ingredient that an organization needs to
remain viable. They found they did not have the coherent message essential to
make their projects work. Yes, they had an idea for everywhere but that was an
idea that worked nowhere in the real world. And so, to remain viable and hang
on to the gains they made in seizing the system, they started throwing insults
in every direction to hide the failures of their often half-baked master plans
– the plans that always came with no exit strategy and no plan B.
You can see the
effect of this mind boggling situation in the article written by Jackson Diehl
under the title: “Obama's 'unity government' plan in Iraq is just a mirage,”
published on July 6, 2014 in the Washington Post where the author begins by
insulting the Obama administration for picking up the pieces of strategies left
for it in a state of chaos, having been devised by the Jewish lobby and run by
Jews for half a century or longer.
Instead of
describing what he sees and go from there to make his point or offer new ideas,
Diehl spins what is not there to make it sound like the current administration
is doing the wrong thing about a situation that should be handled differently.
Here is how he does that: “The Obama administration has developed the bad habit
of founding its Middle East strategies on
wishful thinking.” Well, the Jews were in the driver's seat for half a century
and they brought the Middle East to where it
is today. Now that President Obama is doing what is necessary to calm the
situation, prevent things from getting out of hand, and gain enough time to
stabilize the situation, Diehl has nothing to offer but insults. What can be
more Jewish than that?
He goes on to do
what Jews have been doing for fifty years which is to (1) imagine and tell what
everyone in the Middle East and outside of it thinks, feels and plans to do,
(2) predict how the future will unfold as if he were a prophet of the
post-modern era and (3) what the consequences will be – which is nothing short
of apocalyptic unless Obama puts the whole thing back into the hands of the
same Jews who created the existing mess in the first place.